Spherical Cavity in Dielectric Subject to Uniform Field

CaptainMarvel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The polarization charge on the surface of a spherical cavity is - \sigma_e cos(\theta) at a point whose radius vector from the centre makes an angle \thetawith a given axis Oz. Prove that the field strength at the centre is \frac {\sigma_e}{3 \epsilon_o} parallel to Oz.

If the cavity is in a uniform dielectric subject to a field of strength E_o parallel to the direction \theta = 0, show that \sigma_e = \frac {3 E_o \epsilon_o ( \epsilon_r -1)} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r} where \epsilon_r is the relative permittivity of the dielectic. Verify that that this gives the correct value for the field strength at the centre of the cavity E = \frac {3 \epsilon_r E_o} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r} and note that \sigma_e is not simply ( \epsilon_r - 1 ) \epsilon_o E_o because of the distortion of the field in the dielectric caused by the presence of the cavity.




The Attempt at a Solution



The first part of the question is no problem and deriving the field strength in the center which it asks you to verify using boundary conditions etc. etc. is no problem.

However polarization charge density = P . \hat{n} = - P cos( \theta ) which is the form of what's given at the beginning of the question leading to \sigma_e = P

Therefore:

P = ( \epsilon_r - 1 ) \epsilon_o E

Subbing in my equation for field inside:

P = ( \epsilon_r - 1 ) \epsilon_o \frac {3 \epsilon_r E_o} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r}

Which is the answer they want, apart from I have an extra \epsilon_r term in the numerator.

Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I say 'my equation for field inside' I mean:

E = \frac {3 \epsilon_r E_o} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r}

as verified in the question.

Thanks everyone.
 
Please can somebody give me some idea as to where I'm going wrong?

:-(
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top