Spherical Refraction Surfaces. (I'm confused as to how you get the answer.

afcwestwarrior
Messages
453
Reaction score
0
A beam of parallel light rays from a laser is incident on a solid transparent sphere of index of refraction n. (a) If a point image is produced at the back of the sphere, what is the index of refraction of the sphere.

Here's the equation you use to find the index of refraction of the sphere.

(n1/p ) + (n2/ i) = (n2 - n1 ) / (r)

P (object distance or laser distance) = infinity (makes sense)

i (image distance) = 2r

r = radius of curvature

n1 (object's side refraction index) = 1.000 (air)

n2 (refractive index of the sphere ) = ?




(1/ infinity) + (n2 / 2r) = (n2 - 1) / r


somehow 1 / infinity goes away

so it becomes
(n2 / 2r) = (n2 - 1) / r

now it becomes n2 = 2 (n2-1)

r's cancel out


now it becomes n2 = 2n2 - 2


The answer is n2 = 2

How did they just get 2 when I have n2 = 2n2 - 2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind I figured it out. It becomes

n2/n2 = ( 2n2/n2) - (2/n2)

then it becomes

1 = 2 - 2/n2

then it becomes

1 + 2/n2 =2

then it becomes

2/n2 = 2 -1

then it becomes

2/n2 = 1

then 2 = n2
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top