Solving the Spinning Wheel Problem - Jonathan

  • Thread starter Thread starter zarcon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinning Wheel
AI Thread Summary
Rotating objects can exhibit both rotational and translational motion due to the application of forces. When a spinning bicycle wheel bounces off the ground, friction causes it to move forward, demonstrating that forces applied away from the center of mass induce torque and translation. A force applied directly at the center of mass results in translation without rotation, while off-center forces create both effects. This interaction does not violate physical laws, as the increase in kinetic energy is a result of the work done over a greater distance during rotation. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between rotation and translation in physics.
zarcon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi All! This is my first real post here.

I have a pretty basic question regarding rotating objects and the manner in which the rotation becomes a translation.

If I drop a bicycle wheel against the ground, it bounces back toward my hand. But if the wheel is spinning as it falls, it will move forward after it bounces.

I know (think) this is because of the opposing friction from the contact of the spinning wheel and the ground, but a diagram of the forces would show a frictional force perpendicular to the wheel's center of mass. Shouldn't this then be a completely rotational force?

If the wheel is floating perfectly still in space and a force is applied perpendicular to the wheel's center of mass, it will cause the object to spin without any linear translation, like a basketball on the end of somebody's finger, or a plate on a stick, right?

So a perpendicular force applied opposite to the direction an object is rotating will cause it to move in the direction of the force? Is that right? How would that be calculated?

Thanks! Hope I made my question understandable. Anything to point me in the right direction would be really appreciated.

Jonathan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is something that takes a bit getting used to, but there's no such thing as 'only a rotational force'. I know, it's completely counter-intuitive, but if you apply a force so that it hits the center of mass, then it produces a translation but no rotation. However, if you apply this same force at a different point such that it induces a torque and a rotation, it will still product the same translation!

This is NOT a violation of any laws. You may be thinking "but isn't there also an increase in kinetic energy, due to the fact that the object is rotation AND translating". That would be a true statement. However, when you apply a force away from the center of mass, the force is applied over a greater distance as the object rotates, and subsequently the increase in kinetic energy comes from the fact that you really did increase the amount of work you did on the object.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

Friction on a spinning wheel when it is dropped onto the ground
Replies
30
Views
1K
What if I force a spinning wheel not to precede?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I How Does Changing Mass and Spring Force Affect Watch Oscillators?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Gyroscopic precession of a bicycle wheel
Replies
4
Views
4K
I Gyroscopic precession of a spin-stabilized bullet
Replies
10
Views
4K
I How is static friction the centripetal force during a car turning?
2
Replies
73
Views
9K
I Rolling Without Slipping
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
A Forces on rotating disk object
2
Replies
67
Views
5K
I How do we calculate the energy we used to do something?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I A perfectly stiff wheel cannot roll on a stiff floor?
3
Replies
116
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top