Spinors and Lorentzgroups: representation of the complete Lorentzgroup?

Trinitiet
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

This question is about Lorentzgroups. In my course of Relativity, we've seen a very little about representations of complete Lorentz groups but there are two little exercises, which we can do, but I do not understand what should be checked, not even how to start this.

The question is the following:
A/Does the Lagrangian L = i u*^{Adot} \partial_{A Adot} u^{Adot} (with u^A a spinor field and u* a conjugated spinor) form a scalar under the complete Lorentzgroup?

B/What about the Lagrangian L = F_{mu nu} F*^{mu nu}, and I suppose this F is the Electromagnetic Maxwell Tensor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor)

Homework Equations



/

The Attempt at a Solution



Don't even understand the meaning of "a scalar under the complete Lorentzgroup".

Thanks for any help you can offer and a Merry Christmas to all of you!

Trinitiet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is a scalar in general and <under the restricted Lorentz group> ? Look this notion up in your notes.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top