Stability Order of resonating structures

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the stability of resonance structures of vinyl chloride. The user believes the order of stability should be I>III>II, arguing that structure I is most stable due to having no charge, while structure II is less stable because it features a positively charged chlorine atom, which is electronegative. However, the book states the order as I>II>III, prompting confusion. A key point of contention is the valence electrons of chlorine in structure III, which the user calculates as 10, raising questions about its validity since chlorine can typically hold a maximum of 8 electrons. This leads to the conclusion that structure III may not be a permissible resonance structure based on standard electron capacity rules.
randomgamernerd
Messages
139
Reaction score
4
I have uploaded the picture of the structures because I couldn't figure out how to type.
Its vinyl chloride.
15314715716633361855743515196350.jpg

According to me the order should be
I>III>II
because I has no charge so it must be most stable
in II we have Cl an electronegative element bearing positive charge which makes it unstable.
Hence I get the order.
But the book says the order is I>II>III
Please Help
 

Attachments

  • 15314715716633361855743515196350.jpg
    15314715716633361855743515196350.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 1,329
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How many electrons are in the valence shell of the Cl in III?
 
mjc123 said:
How many electrons are in the valence shell of the Cl in III?
apparently 10how is that possibleit can hold at max 8 if I'm not wrong
 
So III is not a permissible resonance structure according to the ordinary rules.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top