Standing wave with specific initial/boundary conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a wave equation with specific initial and boundary conditions. The first boundary condition, which requires the slope to be zero at x=0, only restricts the solution to D=0, allowing for C to remain unrestricted. The second boundary condition provides a value for k, confirming the presence of a standing wave. The participants clarify their understanding of the initial conditions, particularly how to interpret the delta function, which leads to a successful application of absolute value in the solution process. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting boundary conditions in wave equations.
Isow
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Solve the wave equation with the following initial conditions and boundary conditions."

2Y/∂x2 = 1/v2 * ∂2Y/∂t2

Boundary conditions:
∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0 and Y(x=L,t)=0

Initial Conditions:
∂Y/∂t(x, t=0) = 0
Y(x,t=0) = δ(x-L/2)

Homework Equations



Using separation of variables:

Y(x,t) = X(x)*T(t)

X(x) = C*cos(kx/L) + D*sin(kx/L)
T(t) = E*cos(wt) + F*sin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm relatively familiar with this process but I have a couple of hangups relating to these specific initial conditions. First, the requirement that the partial of y with respect to x=0 at all times t (first boundary condition) seems, to me, to make a wave impossible. It gives D=0 AND C=0 OR k=0, but of course all of these are unsatisfactory solutions.

More analytically, it seems that requiring the slope to always be 0 at x=0 is really restricting that piece of the wave from moving. I'm just not sure how to handle it.

Moving past that though (I assumed y(x=0,t)=0 as my first boundary condition giving C=0), I'm also not sure how to handle the initial condition. The initial condition equation, x-L/2, has an integral of 0 when integrated from 0 to L. This makes sense since the expression has equal area above and below y=0, but I still don't know how to handle it in terms of getting an actual solution.

Just thinking out loud as I type this, does the delta in the expression indicate that I should be treating it as an absolute value equation so that all of it is forced to be above y=0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isow said:

Homework Statement



"Solve the wave equation with the following initial conditions and boundary conditions."

2Y/∂x2 = 1/v2 * ∂2Y/∂t2

Boundary conditions:
∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0 and Y(x=L,t)=0

Initial Conditions:
∂Y/∂t(x, t=0) = 0
Y(x,t=0) = δ(x-L/2)

Homework Equations



Using separation of variables:

Y(x,t) = X(x)*T(t)

X(x) = C*cos(kx/L) + D*sin(kx/L)
T(t) = E*cos(wt) + F*sin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm relatively familiar with this process but I have a couple of hangups relating to these specific initial conditions. First, the requirement that the partial of y with respect to x=0 at all times t (first boundary condition) seems, to me, to make a wave impossible. It gives D=0 AND C=0 OR k=0, but of course all of these are unsatisfactory solutions.

More analytically, it seems that requiring the slope to always be 0 at x=0 is really restricting that piece of the wave from moving. I'm just not sure how to handle it.

Moving past that though (I assumed y(x=0,t)=0 as my first boundary condition giving C=0), I'm also not sure how to handle the initial condition. The initial condition equation, x-L/2, has an integral of 0 when integrated from 0 to L. This makes sense since the expression has equal area above and below y=0, but I still don't know how to handle it in terms of getting an actual solution.

Just thinking out loud as I type this, does the delta in the expression indicate that I should be treating it as an absolute value equation so that all of it is forced to be above y=0?
The Boundary condition, ∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0, only makes D = 0 with no restriction on C.
The other Boundary condition gives you k .

It's a standing wave. Right?

What are the conditions at nodes and at anti-nodes?
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks, that was exactly what I needed! I realized the first boundary condition only set D=0, but I erroneously was thinking that the second boundary condition gave C=0 when, in fact, you're right: it gives k.

I then applied the second initial condition in terms of absolute value, which I think is the correct way to go about it, and everything worked out.

Thanks again!

edit: and yes, it's a standing wave.
 
Isow said:
Hey, thanks, that was exactly what I needed! I realized the first boundary condition only set D=0, but I erroneously was thinking that the second boundary condition gave C=0 when, in fact, you're right: it gives k.

I then applied the second initial condition in terms of absolute value, which I think is the correct way to go about it, and everything worked out.

Thanks again!
You're very welcome.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top