Static electricity and method of seperating

winston
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The figure below shows an electrostatic method of separating conducting and non-conducting spheres

scan.jpg


Why do the conducting spheres fall off from the roller while the non-conducting spheres have to be scrapped off?



Thanks for the help.
Cheers,
Winston
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the significance of conducting?
 
Not too sure... Is the answer something about non-conductors holding the charge at the surface but charges in conductors flow throughout the material. But I thought that all the spheres will become negatively charged upon contact with the negatively charged roller.

HELP. THANKS
 
Is the answer something about non-conductors holding the charge at the surface but charges in conductors flow throughout the material.
Yes.

For the non-conducting material, the mobile charges (electrons) do not move so readily, so electrons will not flow onto the positively charged non-conducting material

In the 'conductor', the mobile charges (electrons) readily flow thus reducing the positive charge while the conducting material traverses the arc.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top