Static Equilibrium: Finding More than One Balance Point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of static equilibrium in a fulcrum problem, where the balance of weights A and B depends on their moment arms. It is noted that if the weights are identical, their distances from the pivot must also be equal for balance. However, participants question the possibility of multiple balance points for weight B, suggesting that the intuitive solution may overlook other configurations. The consensus is that unless weight B is moved perpendicularly, the centers of mass must align at the same moment arm. The discussion concludes with uncertainty about alternative positioning for achieving balance.
unctarheels1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Static Equilibrium?

Summing the moments up from around the center, it is easy to find the intuitive location for the weight at B which would be the same as the A side. But how are there more locations to make this system balance??
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the pans are symmetrically located and of the same size, then one simply needs the sum of the moments to be zero.

This is essentially a fulcrum problem in which the product of the weight of mass A (mAg) and its moment arm about the central axis (pivot point) must equal the product of weight B (mBg) and its moment. If the weights are identical, then the moment arms must also be identical.
 
Right, so summing up the moments from the center would say you would have to put the weight on Pan B the same distance from the center as the weight on Pan A.

The questions makes it seem like their are more than one position that the weight can be placed on Pan B to balance the system. Am I missing something?
 
unctarheels1 said:
Right, so summing up the moments from the center would say you would have to put the weight on Pan B the same distance from the center as the weight on Pan A.
Yes
unctarheels1 said:
The questions makes it seem like their are more than one position that the weight can be placed on Pan B to balance the system. Am I missing something?
I was wondering about that myself. Other than moving the mass B perpendicularly (in or out of the plane of the paper), I don't readily see an alternative. The centers of mass of A and B have to be at the same moment arm, unless I am missing something.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top