Static Equilibrium in Fluids: Pressure and Depth

AI Thread Summary
To determine the depth of mercury in a cylindrical container filled with water, the pressure at the bottom must be analyzed using the equation P(bottom) = P(atmosphere) + density * gravity * height. The total pressure at the bottom combines contributions from both mercury and water. The correct approach involves equating the atmospheric pressure and the pressures due to the heights of mercury and water, expressed as P(atm) + dens(mercury) * g * d + dens(water) * g * (1.2 - d). By substituting the known values and solving for depth d, the problem can be effectively addressed. This method ensures a comprehensive understanding of static equilibrium in fluids.
smichels
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A cylindrical container 1.2 m tall contains mercury to a certain depth, d. The rest of the cylinder is filled with water. If the pressure at the bottom of the cylinder is 1.9 atm, what is the depth d?

Does anyone have any ideas on how to approach this problem, better yet,solve it!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We are not here to solve problems, until you show us that you have tried your best and shown us the attempts. Then we'll guide you as best as we can.
 
Hint: Potential Energy
 
Sure, I understand. Here is what I have done so far:
The pressure at the bottom of a cylinder is equal to the force at the bottom divided by the Area, or

[P(bottom) = P(atmosphere) + density*gravity*height.

because we are dealing with water and mercury, do I need to equate this formula to:

P(at) + dens(water)*gravity*Height(cylinder)=P(at)+dens(mercury)*gravity*height(x). Where we solve for the height (x)

Am I on the right track?..
 
Some corrections.

P at bottom = P_atm + P(due to mercury) + P(due to water)
= P_atm + dens(mercury)*(height of mercury)*g + dens(water)*(height of water)*g.

Now you can put h of Hg as d and h of water as 1.2-d, ans solve. (Whether you have to neglect atm pressure depends on whether that has been mentioned in the problem.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top