Static Equilibrium: Find Normal Force and x-Coord of CM

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the normal forces exerted by two concrete blocks supporting a 6.3-meter plank with a mass of 44.5 kg. Initially, the normal forces from the left (NL) and right (NR) blocks were estimated at 566.9 N and 1003 N, respectively, but this was deemed incorrect due to the need for rotational equilibrium considerations. The correct approach involves summing moments about one of the support points to ensure all forces and moments balance. Additionally, the discussion includes determining the normal forces when a 62.4 kg person stands on the plank and calculating the x-coordinate of the center of mass for the plank-person system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering both translational and rotational equilibrium in static problems.
biomajor009
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 6.3-m long plank is supported by two concrete blocks, one that is placed 2 m from the left end of the plank and another that is placed 1.2 m from the right end. The mass of the plank is 44.5 kg.

(a) Find the normal force from each of the concrete blocks on the plank. Call the normal force from the left block NL and the normal force from the right block NR.

(b) Find the normal force from each of the concrete blocks if a 62.4 kg person stands on the plank, 2.7 m from the left end.

(c) Find the x-coordinate of the center of mass of the plank-person system described in the previous part, using the left end of the plank as x = 0.

(d) How close to the left end of the plank can the person get before the plank starts to tip over?


Homework Equations


\SigmaFx = 0
\SigmaFy = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


Found NL = 566.9 and NR = 1003 but I'm not 100% confident
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's not correct; all forces must sum to zero and you must also consider rotational equilibrium \Sigma M = 0 about any point. Hint: the 44Kg mass acts at the cm of the plank. Then sum moments of all forces about one of the concrete block support points.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top