Static Pulley Problem on an Incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a pulley on an incline, with a static friction coefficient of 0.64. The key point is that at an incline of 23 degrees, the maximum mass m that can be placed without sliding is theoretically unlimited, as the frictional force from block M is sufficient to hold block m in place. The confusion arises from the calculation of angles, particularly the critical angle of 33 degrees, beyond which tension in the rope becomes necessary to prevent sliding. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free body diagrams and correctly analyzing the forces involved, noting that assumptions about friction and motion must be carefully considered. Ultimately, the analysis reveals that for angles less than 33 degrees, block m remains stationary due to its own friction, independent of the mass of block M.
equinom
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The problem is: Two blocks of mass m and M are connected via pulley with a configuration as shown. The coefficient of static friction is 0.64, between blocks and surface. If the inclined angle is 23deg and M = 3.1kg, what is the maximum mass m so that no sliding occurs?

The question is: I understand how m=0.64(3.1)/(sin23-0.64cos23) but how can I explain the negative mass? Also, when you look at the denominator there is a restriction that theta can't equal 33 degrees. What exactly does that mean?

zCIl5YWzAO2G8HFirJD_Uc-_aNHqSe7VvWfD1JpjHtLTc46wC7RwHQ3dlUjOqIUlNtF8i3BdiRPPuVw1Jayj6cc183mDKfvi.png
 

Attachments

  • zCIl5YWzAO2G8HFirJD_Uc-_aNHqSe7VvWfD1JpjHtLTc46wC7RwHQ3dlUjOqIUlNtF8i3BdiRPPuVw1Jayj6cc183mDKfvi.png
    zCIl5YWzAO2G8HFirJD_Uc-_aNHqSe7VvWfD1JpjHtLTc46wC7RwHQ3dlUjOqIUlNtF8i3BdiRPPuVw1Jayj6cc183mDKfvi.png
    3.5 KB · Views: 685
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have an error somewhere in your analysis.

Draw a free body diagram for each block (include ALL forces on each block). Then write the equations of motion and set the system acceleration to zero.
 
@equinom I think you calculated the angle that the denominator is less than zero incorrectly. [Editing after further analysis: See below=your calculations are correct]. That angle is around 10 degrees,(I will compute it more precisely momentarily) and what that means is the mass m will stay on the surface without creating any tension in the rope, and won't need the full available frictional force of ## \mu \, mg \cos{\theta} ## to keep it from sliding. Instead the frictional force on block ## m ## will be only ## mg \sin{\theta} ## for angles ## \theta ## of 10 degrees and less. ## \\ ## Edit: Scratch that=your calculation of 33 degrees is correct. What that means is at 23 degrees, its own frictional force, regardless of the value of mass ## m, ## will hold the mass ## m ## in place. Mass ## m ## can be as heavy as you like at 23 degrees. Tension in the rope occurs only for ## \theta>33 ## degrees. The formula you have for the maximum mass ## m ## only applies for angles ## \theta>33 ## degrees. ## \\ ## For ## \theta<33 ## degrees, there is no limit to the maximum ## m ## that you could put there. It would be held in place by its own friction, and wouldn't need the mass ## M ## to help hold it there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes equinom and haruspex
Dr.D said:
You seem to have an error somewhere in your analysis.

Draw a free body diagram for each block (include ALL forces on each block). Then write the equations of motion and set the system acceleration to zero.
@Dr.D Please see my edited comments of post 3. I think the OP has stumbled on an interesting case where the angle of inclination is sufficiently small, that no sliding occurs, regardless of the value of the mass ## m ##. :)
 
Last edited:
equinom said:
when you look at the denominator there is a restriction that theta can't equal 33 degrees. What exactly does that mean?
It tells you you have made a wrong assumption in obtaining the equation. You did indeed make an assumption... what was it?
 
Charles Link said:
Please see my edited comments of post 3. I think the OP has stumbled on an interesting case where the angle of inclination is sufficiently small, that no sliding occurs, regardless of the value of the mass m m . :)

While this is certainly possible (I have not calculated it), FBDs for the two bodies are still the right place to start.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
"For theta<33 degrees, there is no limit to the maximum ## m ## that you could put there. It would be held in place by its own friction, and wouldn't need the mass M to help hold it there.

Hmm, in an extreme case that m=1000kg, how can the friction created by a M=3.1kg block hold it in place. Something doesn't add up? Otherwise, thank-you for your explanation, it definitely makes me think about the problem a little differently.
 
equinom said:
Hmm, in an extreme case that m=1000kg, how can the friction created by a M=3.1kg block hold it in place. Something doesn't add up? Otherwise, thank-you for your explanation, it definitely makes me think about the problem a little differently.
@haruspex has a good question for you @equinom in post 5.
 
Charles Link said:
@haruspex has a good question for you @equinom in post 5.

Next question is, what is the assumption that I made? Probably that the blocks would move down the incline and that friction would be in the opposite direction. After playing with the equation a bit I get m=μM/(sinθ-μcosθ) and mathematically sinθ-μcosθ≠0 or tanθ≠μ. Is that always true or did I make an incorrect of assumption?
 
  • #10
equinom said:
Next question is, what is the assumption that I made? Probably that the blocks would move down the incline and that friction would be in the opposite direction. After playing with the equation a bit I get m=μM/(sinθ-μcosθ) and mathematically sinθ-μcosθ≠0 or tanθ≠μ. Is that always true or did I make an incorrect of assumption?
The incorrect assumption is that the frictional force is always ##F_f= \mu \, mg \cos{\theta} ##. When ## \theta=0 ##, the object will rest there freely. Is the frictional force=## \mu \, mg ## for this case? What is the frictional force for ## \theta=0 ##, even though ## \cos(0)=1 ##? (Also see my post 3 again).
 
  • Like
Likes equinom
Back
Top