Statics-Two wires holding traffic light

  • Thread starter Thread starter lrp3395
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Wires
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in two wires supporting a 33 kg traffic light, with angles of 53° and 37° for the respective wires. The correct weight of the light is established as 323 N, using the gravitational constant of 9.8 m/s². Through various equations, the tensions in the left and right wires are determined to be approximately 230 N and 180 N, respectively. A participant acknowledges an earlier miscalculation regarding the weight used in their equations. The final calculations confirm that the tensions are consistent with the forces acting on the system.
lrp3395
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Screen Shot 2011-11-19 at 8.48.14 PM.png


I don't know what i did wrong

Find the tension in the two wires supporting the traffic light
Mass of light= 33 kg
θ of FT1= 53°
θ of FT2=37°

Ʃfx=0
Ft1cos53-ft2cos37=0
ft1cos53=ft2cos37

Ʃfy=mg
ft1sin53-ft2sin37=mg
ft1sin53=mg+ft2sin37
ft1=(ft2sin37+mg)/sin53
ft1=1.33ft2

1.33ft2=(ft2sin37+mg)/sin53
1.33ft2=.72ft2+mg
.61ft2=323.73 N
Ft2=530.7n

ft1cos53=ft2cos37
ft1cos53=423.84n
ft1=704.26n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tension forces always pull away from the objects on which they act. In the horizontal direction, your equation is correct. Not so in the vertical direction.
 
This is what I got:
TLsin(53o) + TRsin(37o) - 294 N= 0 TRcos(37o) - TLcos(53o) = 0
TR = TLcos(53o)/cos(37o)

TLsin(53o) + TRsin(37o) - 294N= 0
TLsin(53o) + {TLcos(53o)/cos(37o)}sin(37o) - 294 = 0
TLsin(53o) + TLcos(53o)tan(37o) = 294N
TL(sin(53o) + cos(53o)tan(37o)) = 294N
TL = (294 N)/(sin(53o) + cos(53o)tan(37o)) = 234.79884N = 230N

TR = TLcos(53o)/cos(37o)
TR = (234.79884 N)cos(53o)/cos(37o) = 176.9336 N = 180N

Left wire has 230N of tension
Right wire has 180N of tension
 
I don't know where you got the 294N from? 33kg * 9.8 = 323N. g is 9.8, not 8.9!

Your maths seems right though.

You can check your answer easily also. 230sin(53) + 180sin(37) = 292N, which is close enough (since you rounded your answers) to 294.
 
Well dangit... I guess I got that one wrong then!
 
PhantomJay is correct

jzCpx.jpg


Hope this helps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top