Stone is dropped from the top of a cliff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alice
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A stone is dropped from a cliff and takes 3.66 seconds to hit the ground, prompting a discussion on how to calculate the height of the cliff. The initial velocity is zero, and the final position is ground level, indicating that gravitational acceleration is at play. Participants suggest using the kinematic equations for constant acceleration to relate the variables involved. The key equation discussed is the one that incorporates displacement, time, and acceleration, which can be adapted for vertical motion. By substituting the appropriate values, the height of the cliff can be determined.
Alice
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey

This seems to be way easy, but I'm just not gettng where to start it. A stone is dropped from the top of a cliff, it is seen to hit the ground below after 3.66 s, how high is the cliff? Anyone know? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Alice
A stone is dropped from the top of a cliff,

That means that vi=0, and the yi the height of the cliff, which is unknown. Implicit in this is that the acceleration of the stone is that of gravity.

it is seen to hit the ground below after 3.66 s,

That means that Δt=3.66s. Implicit in that is that yf=0, which is ground level.

how high is the cliff? Anyone know?

Can you find an equation that relates those quantities?
 
Mentor Edit: Please don't post complete solutions. Thank you.[/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tom-

I pretty much got that far on my own. I just don't know which formula ot use. The one that looks the closes would be

/\=Delta

/\X=X-Xo=VoxT+1/2AxT^2

and

Vx^2-Vox^2=2Ax/\x

but I'm not sure. I'm having a really hard time figuring out which formula goes where. Thanks.

-Alice
 
Originally posted by Alice
/\X=X-Xo=VoxT+1/2AxT^2
This one always works for a constant acceleration. And, of course, that "X" doesn't have to be horizontal.
 
Originally posted by turin
This one always works for a constant acceleration. And, of course, that "X" doesn't have to be horizontal.

Right, the equation also holds for "y".

Alice, look at the equation that turin referred to, rewrite it for y (just replace x with y), and verify that you do in fact have all the information to solve the problem. Then, plug in the numbers.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top