Stone is dropped from the top of a cliff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alice
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A stone is dropped from a cliff and takes 3.66 seconds to hit the ground, prompting a discussion on how to calculate the height of the cliff. The initial velocity is zero, and the final position is ground level, indicating that gravitational acceleration is at play. Participants suggest using the kinematic equations for constant acceleration to relate the variables involved. The key equation discussed is the one that incorporates displacement, time, and acceleration, which can be adapted for vertical motion. By substituting the appropriate values, the height of the cliff can be determined.
Alice
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey

This seems to be way easy, but I'm just not gettng where to start it. A stone is dropped from the top of a cliff, it is seen to hit the ground below after 3.66 s, how high is the cliff? Anyone know? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Alice
A stone is dropped from the top of a cliff,

That means that vi=0, and the yi the height of the cliff, which is unknown. Implicit in this is that the acceleration of the stone is that of gravity.

it is seen to hit the ground below after 3.66 s,

That means that Δt=3.66s. Implicit in that is that yf=0, which is ground level.

how high is the cliff? Anyone know?

Can you find an equation that relates those quantities?
 
Mentor Edit: Please don't post complete solutions. Thank you.[/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tom-

I pretty much got that far on my own. I just don't know which formula ot use. The one that looks the closes would be

/\=Delta

/\X=X-Xo=VoxT+1/2AxT^2

and

Vx^2-Vox^2=2Ax/\x

but I'm not sure. I'm having a really hard time figuring out which formula goes where. Thanks.

-Alice
 
Originally posted by Alice
/\X=X-Xo=VoxT+1/2AxT^2
This one always works for a constant acceleration. And, of course, that "X" doesn't have to be horizontal.
 
Originally posted by turin
This one always works for a constant acceleration. And, of course, that "X" doesn't have to be horizontal.

Right, the equation also holds for "y".

Alice, look at the equation that turin referred to, rewrite it for y (just replace x with y), and verify that you do in fact have all the information to solve the problem. Then, plug in the numbers.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top