Stretching of a wire due to it's weight

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum length of a steel wire that can hang vertically without breaking, using the breaking stress and density of steel. Participants clarify the application of stress and strain formulas, emphasizing that stress is the internal force per unit area, while strain measures the deformation due to external forces. The maximum tension occurs at the top of the wire, where it is equal to the weight of the wire itself. In the second part, the elongation of a bar due to its own weight is analyzed, with a consensus that the weight of the bar, not the wire, should be considered. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying the forces and applying the appropriate equations in each scenario.
palkia
Messages
52
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



1) calculate the longest
length of steel wire that can hang vertically without breaking
.breaking stress for steel=7.982*10^8N/m^2 and density of
steel(d)=8.1*10^3kg/m^3.2)A bar of mass m and length l is hanging from a point A as shown in the figure.Find the increase in it's length due to it's own weight.The Young's modulus of eleasticity of the wire is Y and area of cross section of the wire is A.

Homework Equations



Y=ΔL/L, Stress=F/A

The Attempt at a Solution



The first questions solves using equation of stress

The second question solves on the basis of strain

I am confused on which formulae to apply... I don't know when to apply which one so can you tell me when to use when and what exactly is the factor deciding to use them.

Can we integrate in the second question for all points in the bar...
[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, you have noted the correct equation for stress. The max tension in the wire for a given length must be equal to ? from Newton's first law? Where does it occur?

For part 2, you could integrate , but it is easier to use the average tension in the bar, due to the linear variation of the load, but your equation is for constant strain, and not equal to Y, and not equal to the deflection,
 
  • Like
Likes palkia
Since the stress is magnitude of the internal restoring force per unit which in this case is the tension then it will be greatest at the top
How exactly did you know to apply the formulae for strain in the second case...I struggled a lot for that

My definitions prior to solving a question for stress and strain is:

StressThe magnitude of the internal force per unit area that occurs due to external force which tends to restore the body to it's original stateStrain:When the size gets changed of the body due to external forcesIn the first case,is that it is asking about the greatest length so as not to undergo any change in it's dimensions( Does breaking means being stretched)

In the second case,is it because it is said it is stretching that we have to use the definition of strain?Am I thinking right ?
 
Last edited:
Well, not quite. Let's look at part a first. The max tension occurs at the top, correct. What is that tension equal to ? Note that stress is force per unit area, leave out that part about 'restoring to its original length'. Tensile stress under axial loading is F/A, period. Where F in this case is T. And T at the top must be equal to the ___?___ of the wire, using equilibrium law.
Also, breaking stress is a property of the material, and is the stress at which the wire will break. It has to elongate before it breaks, all materials deform under stress.
 
  • Like
Likes palkia
Since at the top,the maximum tension acting on is the weight of the wire mg (Why are we calculating this for the upprmost point tho)If at breaking stress,it has to elongate before it breaks then can we use the formulae of strain here maybe
 
palkia said:
Why are we calculating this for the upprmost point tho
It is the same radius all the way down, so if it is going to break, where will that be?
palkia said:
If at breaking stress,it has to elongate before it breaks
True, but how is that relevant in part 1? Will elongation at a point somehow stop it breaking there? The tension remains the same.
 
  • Like
Likes palkia
haruspex said:
It is the same radius all the way down, so if it is going to break, where will that be?

Makes sense then.So the uppermost point is most probable to break first
haruspex said:
True, but how is that relevant in part 1? Will elongation at a point somehow stop it breaking there? The tension remains the same.

So the strain will not tell us the condition for breaking but the stress will,right?
If the breaking stress is equal to the external force (weight) at the topmost point then beyond this the wire breaks,right?What does breaking mean here by the way...the wire gets detached
 
palkia said:
So the strain will not tell us the condition for breaking but the stress will,right?
If the breaking stress is equal to the external force (weight) at the topmost point then beyond this the wire breaks,right
Right. In practice, it will stretch first, but that reduces the cross sectional area, so increases the stress. Unless by some means the stretch also increases the modulus, the stretching will accelerate.
palkia said:
What does breaking mean here by the way...the wire gets detached
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes palkia
In the second case,the wire gets elongated but the restoring force that is tension remains constant but it;'s width get elongated so will stress also act in that case?
 
  • #10
palkia said:
In the second case,the wire gets elongated but the restoring force that is tension remains constant?
Yes.
I had not looked at part 2. I am dubious of this:
palkia said:
due to its own weight.
Is that really what the question says? That would mean due to the weight of the wire, but surely it is the weight of the bar that is to be used?
 
  • #11
Yep.It's the weight of the bar...I kinda mixed the wire from the first case

In the second case,some stress will be acting because the width gets elongated...I have heard that young's modulus makes sense when stress and strain are proportional.

In the second case,the wire is acting along the length of the wire which is elongating the wire and which varies with the distance along the bar so we have to integrate it
 
  • #12
palkia said:
Yep.It's the weight of the bar...I kinda mixed the wire from the first case

In the second case,some stress will be acting because the width gets elongated...I have heard that young's modulus makes sense when stress and strain are proportional.

In the second case,the wire is acting along the length of the wire which is elongating the wire and which varies with the distance along the bar so we have to integrate it
Is this also wrong:
palkia said:
A bar of mass m and length l
It's a bar of mass m and a wire of length l, right?

There's no need for integration. This is not the same wire as in the first part, so we are not given a mass, and we can assume it is to be ignored.
Thus the tension is the same throughout, and the percentage extension likewise.

palkia said:
Y=ΔL/L
That is incorrect.
ΔL/L is the strain (ε)
F/A is the stress (σ)
Young's modulus (E or Y) = σ/ε
 
  • #13
I think the book considers the bar and wire to be same because they have done the integration using the weight per unit length
 
  • #14
palkia said:
I think the book considers the bar and wire to be same because they have done the integration using the weight per unit length
OK, that makes sense - no wire, just a bar.

Problems like this can be a bit tricky because you have two measures of the position of an element of the bar: its distance from one end when there is no tension and its position when there is tension.
I recommend you to consider an element of thickness dx, and distance x from (what will be) the bottom, when the bar is horizontal, so relaxed.
When suspended, what is tension on the element? What is the elongation of the element?
 
  • #15
In the second question, the problem is asking for the elongation, or change on length, of a bar of mass m and length l hanging from the ceiling, but it then used the word wire when giving properties. I think it is an error. A figure would help.
 
  • #16
Palkia
Please read again my response in post 2. You must have missed it.
 
  • #17
The tension will be - (mg/L)*x where x is the distance from the bottom

Elongation...it should be the force causing the elongation ...in this case the weight so it is (W/AY)dx where dx is the length of the segment
 
  • #18
PhanthomJay said:
Palkia
Please read again my response in post 2. You must have missed it.
I have read it sir...I understood that part about the maximum stress
 
  • #19
palkia said:
The tension will be - (mg/L)*x where x is the distance from the bottom

Elongation...it should be the force causing the elongation ...in this case the weight so it is (W/AY)dx where dx is the length of the segment
Right, so substitute the tension you found for W and integrate.
 
  • #20
Got that
 
Back
Top