Structural Design Philosophies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jnlbctln
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Structural
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on various structural design criteria, including Ultimate Strength Design, Working Stress Design, Limit State Design, and Allowable Stress Design. These terms represent different approaches to ensuring structural integrity based on specific operational requirements. The choice of design method often depends on factors like the need to prevent failure, accommodate cyclical loads, or meet minimum performance standards. Ultimately, these design criteria are not philosophies but rather parameters that guide structural engineering decisions. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for effective structural design.
jnlbctln
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Good day!
I don't know if they are called Structural design philosophy but, can anyone enumerate(if the list is incomplete) and differentiate the :
1. Ultimate Strength Design
2. Working Stress Design
3. Limit State Design
4. Allowable Stress Design
5. Others (If there are)

Help please.. Thanks :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I wouldn't call them philosophies, just structural criteria. A lot of those things are controlled by the intended operation for the task. Sometimes you want a widget just not to break, so you design to maximize ultimate strength. Sometimes there's a cyclical load on it, so you design for fatigue life. Sometimes you have a minimum limit for a widget under a certain loading condition. All of those terms are just different design parameters.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top