Superimposed Simple Harmonic Motions: Resultant Time Period Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the resultant time period when two simple harmonic motions with periods of 3 seconds and 4 seconds are superimposed. It suggests that the term "resultant time period" may not be precise, as the focus could be on the period of the resulting waveform or "beats" created by the superposition of different frequencies. A mathematical approach is proposed, using the formula for oscillations to derive a resultant time period of 5 seconds, although it is noted that time periods cannot be simply added as vectors. The conversation also touches on the idea of the least common multiple (LCM) in relation to the observed graph of the combined waves. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the complexity of superimposing simple harmonic motions and the need for careful interpretation of resultant periods.
the_terminator
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
what is the resultant time period when two simple harmonic motions of time periods 3s and 4s superimpose
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try making an Excel plot to see what happens when you add two sine waves like that. BTW, "resultant time period" is not a precise term -- the original question probably asked for the period of the waveform or something? When you add sound waves of two different frequencies, for example, you get what are called "beats" where the superposition sound gets louder and softer at a specific rate. That may be what the question is asking for you to figure out -- what is the period of the beats when you add these two signals...
 
i think it may be solved this way but not sure if it is right,
let y=Asin(wt+θ) for T=3
and Y=Asin(wt)for T=4 in 1 sec, Y shm reaches an extreme,this implies that
at the other extreme it reaches at t=3 sec (by symmetry)
ie.the shm y completed 1 ossicilation
hence phase diff. of ∏/2
hence although T is not vector one can always relate it to velocity or acc.
hence resultant T=√(3²+4²)=5

ps.do you have the solutions?
 
I didn't understand Row's solution, but maybe a little plot from Mathematica will help the OP:

Plot[{Sin[2 Pi t/3] + 2.5, Sin[2 Pi t/4] + 2.5,
Sin[2 Pi t/3] + Sin[2 Pi t/4]}, {t, 0, 20}, PlotRange -> {-2.5, 5}]
 

Attachments

yep that was a silly thing i guess, so time period cannot be added as vectors
but when you look at the graph,doesnt it seem as 12.
so can we argue that they are the LCM??
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top