Superposition representation of particle state in 1-d infitne well (SUPERPOSITION?)

mak015
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here it is: a particle in 1-d infinite potential well starts in state \Psi(x,0) = A Sin^{3}(\pi*x/a): 0\leqx\leqa.

Express \Psi(x,0) as a superposition in the basis of the solutions of the time independent schrodinger eq for this system, \phi_{n}(x) = (2/a)^{1/2} Sin(n*\pi* x /a).

Homework Equations


What are the steps to take to bring me to the correct answer. I'm not sure what exactly the question is asking for, or rather how to show it.


The Attempt at a Solution


I assume to know that superposition states that \Psi(x,0) = \sumC_{n}*\phi_{n}(x).

Then since they are bound (therefore orthogonal) it can be said that
\int\Psi(x,0)\Psi^{*}_{m}(x,0)dx = 1 from 0 to a.

Can it then be said that \sumC_{n}\int\phi_{n}(x)\Psi^{*}_{m}(x,0)dxalso equals 1, therefor equaling the above eqn?

From here, I don't know how to approach the goal of this problem.


More parts to the question ask for solving for C_{n} and normalizing the first given fctn.


Any help is greatly appreciated!

Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF.

Not 100% sure, but I'm thinking the idea is to use trig identities to express sin3 in terms of sin(π x/a), sin(2π x/a), etc.

Haven't worked this through to know for sure that will work though.
 


Okay, I've looked at this one some more.

A helpful identity is

sinθ = (eiθ - e-iθ) / (2i)


So sin3θ = ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top