Surface Tenstion in Water (Needle resting on water)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FaraDazed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a needle can be supported by water's surface tension and calculating the maximum diameter of a needle that can be supported. The calculations involve using the surface tension of water, the density of steel, and the gravitational force acting on the needle. Initial attempts to derive the maximum diameter led to confusion regarding the correct application of the equations, particularly the role of length in the calculations. Ultimately, the derived maximum diameter of 1.54mm exceeds the given diameter of 0.25mm, indicating a misunderstanding in the calculations. Clarification is needed on whether the surface tension formula applies only to the maximum mass scenario.
FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A needle can be supported by the suface tension of water.

Given the density of steel (7900kg/m^3) a needle with diameter 0.25mm, the surface tension of water (0.072 N/m) and acceleration due to gravity (9.8) show that this is reasonable.

What is the largest diameter needle that could be supported by the surface tension.

Homework Equations



<br /> \gamma=\frac{F}{L} \\<br /> \gamma L = mg \\<br /> 2 \gamma l = mg <br />
That last equation is for the largest possible mass

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have done.
<br /> \gamma L = mg \\<br /> 0.072 × 2.5 × 10^{-4} = 9.8m \\<br /> 1.8×10^{-5}=9.8m<br />
But if I carry that through I get some crazy huge number for the mass which cannot be correct. I suspect that L is not the diameter of the needle but the true length but without that given I don't know how to find it. I know what to do or rather how to use all the values given apart from the density of steel so maybe that is relevant to my first issue but not sure how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The length affects both the surface tension force and the mass of the needle so the length should cancel...

Tension force = 2γ * length
Mass = density * area * length

So the force eqn is..

2γ * length = density * area * length * g

Length cancel.
 
CWatters said:
The length affects both the surface tension force and the mass of the needle so the length should cancel...

Tension force = 2γ * length
Mass = density * area * length

So the force eqn is..

2γ * length = density * area * length * g

Length cancel.

OK thanks. So is it always 2yL or only in the case when its the largest possible mass?
 
If I follow that through, I get confused, see if what I am doing is on the right path or not as its not working out (but I think it is not supposed to - I am not sure)

<br /> 2\gamma L=\rho ALg \\<br /> 2\gamma=\rho Ag \\<br /> 2×0.072=7900×g×A \\<br /> 0.144=77420A \\<br /> A=\frac{0.144}{77420}=1.86×10^{-6}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> A=\pi r^2 \\<br /> r=\sqrt{\frac{A}{\pi}}\\<br /> r=\sqrt{\frac{1.86×10^{-6}}{\pi}}=7.69× 10^{-4}m = 0.77mm<br />

And the diameter would be 1.54mm when it is only supposed to be 0.25mm.

I am really confused.
 
It looks like a two part question to me..

1) Show that surface tension can support a needle of diameter 0.25mm (eg show surface tension is greater than force due to gravity for that size).
2) Then calculate the maximum diameter that can be supported.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top