Synchrotron Spectrum: Constructing an Emission Spectrum

lakmus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I try to construct the emission spectrum from relativistic electron rotating in homogeneous magnetic field - synchrotron. In my lecture notes a found out one really easy derivation using the invariance of
\frac{I'}{(\nu')^3}=\frac{I}{\nu^3}, where I is the specific intensity and \nu is
the frequency. So the radiated intensity from inertial observe frame is
I'=\frac{I (\nu')^3}{\nu^3}, using Doppler effect fromula
I'=\frac{I}{\gamma^3\left(1-\frac{v}{c}\cos{\theta}\right)^3}, where \theta is angle possition on the circular trajectory. I used \theta = \frac{\omega_{cyclotron} t}{\gamma} . Then I plotted the resulting
intensity, which looked ok (at least similar to some I found on the internet). I also did the Fourier transformation (picture uploded). But the critical frequency is too hight, also the peaks are to widt - here (http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node133.html) I found, that the maximum radiadion should be emmited at frequency \propto \gamma^2 \omega_{cyclotron} , blue line at the picture.
Thanks a lot for each advice!
 

Attachments

  • synch.png
    synch.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 555
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first spectrum shows the intensity over time. The Fourier transformation of this shows the frequency of intensity peaks, but not the frequency of the radiation itself. To get this, you would need the complex amplitude in the first plot, and you don't get this with the simple formula you used.

If you want the frequency of the emitted radiation, I think you can neglect the overall motion of the electron around the circle and focus on the parts where you get the intensity peaks. This won't work with your formula for the total intensity, however.
 
Ok, thanks a lot! I thought that it is quite weird, that the frequency dependence came only from the periodic motion. So could I try to correct this formula by adding proper intensity I in the rest frame - the correct frequency dependence? (I tried to change some parameteres and if the period of peaks remain the same, but they would be thinner, I will get more shorter frequences - the correct spectrum)
 
Yes, you need the frequency dependence of the radiation emitted "at one point in time" in some way.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top