Systems Modelling Question - Sinusoidal inputs (Important)

KingDaniel
Messages
44
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi,
When finding the steady-state response to a sinusoidal input, since "s" is a complex number, (a + jw), why do we substitute "s" with only the imaginary part (jw) in the transfer function, G(s) , to get G(jw), rather than substituting the whole complex number to get G(a + jw) ?
Also, how does finding G(s) help us to get the steady-state part of the response anyway?
Quite confused, please please please help!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the Laplace transform of a model, and you want to find its response to some sine-function, you should give the model an input, something like:

Inp(s) = 1 / ( s2 + a2 ) , which is the Laplace transform of

Inp(t) = sin(at) / a.

I think that jω as input is used to determine amplification and phase ( Bode plot ) as a function of ω.
 
Last edited:
@Hesch , okay, so after finding G(jω), knowing the amplitude and phase will help us get the steady-state part of the response?
Also, I still don't get why, in G(s), we substituted "s" with just "jω" only while "s" actually equals "a+jω" and not just "jω".
 
Finding the complete response (steady-state and transient) is a long and laborious task. My lecturer's notes read (since at our stage of the course, we're mostly interested in the steady-state part of the solution and not so much the transient) :

"The simple method for finding the steady-state part of the response to a sinusoidal input is simply to use the imaginary part of "s", substituting "jω" in place of "s" in the transfer function".

Then he goes on to show how to get the magnitude of the transfer function, G(s) / G(jω), and then on to get the phase.

Please explain what the magnitude of the transfer function has to do with the steady-state part of the solution, yss(t)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top