Taking the limit of this as s-> 0 (algebra based)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rela
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
rela
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi all, this may sound trivial but I've been like cranking my brains on this. Probably I just can't see it. Will need someone to shed some light.

Taking the limit of [(1/s)(a-b)/(s^2 + cs + a)] as s-> 0


Homework Equations



Stated above

The Attempt at a Solution



By using L'Hopital rule, I know this limit tends to 0 itself. However, I just can't manipulate the expression algebraically to obtain the same limit of 0. I'm just unable to cancel out that 'solo' s at the denominator. Hence, it appears to me that the limit shoots up to infinity as s-> 0 through algebraic means. I know this is incorrect but I just couldn't figure it out.

Please kindly help me in guiding me along.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rela said:

Homework Statement



Hi all, this may sound trivial but I've been like cranking my brains on this. Probably I just can't see it. Will need someone to shed some light.

Taking the limit of [(1/s)(a-b)/(s^2 + cs + a)] as s-> 0


Homework Equations



Stated above

The Attempt at a Solution



By using L'Hopital rule, I know this limit tends to 0 itself. However, I just can't manipulate the expression algebraically to obtain the same limit of 0. I'm just unable to cancel out that 'solo' s at the denominator. Hence, it appears to me that the limit shoots up to infinity as s-> 0 through algebraic means. I know this is incorrect but I just couldn't figure it out.

Please kindly help me in guiding me along.

Thanks!
You can't use l'Hopital's rule here, because the fraction is not of the form "0/0" or "inf/inf". I understadn what you wrote as
<br /> \lim_{s\to 0}\frac{\frac{1}{s}(a-b)}{s^2+cs+a}<br />
The numerator tends to infinity, the denominator however tends to a, so yes, the expression "blows up" as s-->0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top