Taylor's Formula to derive higher order derivatives

eclayj
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The question asks the student to use Taylor's formula to calculate the exact values of higher derivatives

f '[0], f '' [0], f ''' [0], ... , f^6'[0]

of the function f[x] defined by the power series

x/2 + x^2/12 + x^3/240 +x^4/10080 + ... +((k x^k)/(2 k)!) + ...

My first attempt at a solution resulted in {0, 0, 0, 0 ...} which I know is not correct.

I do know that Taylor's Fromula says that the expansion of f[x] in powers of (x-b) is given by

f + f ' (x-b) + (f '' (x-b)^2)/2! + (f ''' (x-b)^2)/3! ... However, I just can't seem to figure out how to use it when I am given some given expansion such as above. I feel a little silly not being able to figure this out, but can anyone help me think about this? Maybe I need someone to explain it in a slightly different way. Thanks to all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eclayj said:
The question asks the student to use Taylor's formula to calculate the exact values of higher derivatives

f '[0], f '' [0], f ''' [0], ... , f^6'[0]

of the function f[x] defined by the power series

x/2 + x^2/12 + x^3/240 +x^4/10080 + ... +((k x^k)/(2 k)!) + ...

My first attempt at a solution resulted in {0, 0, 0, 0 ...} which I know is not correct.

I do know that Taylor's Formula says that the expansion of f[x] in powers of (x-b) is given by

f + f ' (x-b) + (f '' (x-b)^2)/2! + (f ''' (x-b)^2)/3! ... However, I just can't seem to figure out how to use it when I am given some given expansion such as above. I feel a little silly not being able to figure this out, but can anyone help me think about this? Maybe I need someone to explain it in a slightly different way. Thanks to all.

If f(x) = x/2 + x2/12 + x3/240 +x4/10080 + ... +((k xk)/(2 k)!) + ... ,

then what is f '(x) ? , f ''(x) ? , ...

Then let x = 0 for each derivative.
 
Okay I got it. Looking at it from that approach is a great way to see, conceptually, what is going on. Thanks for taking the time. Of course, it seems that using Taylor Serires could be a rather inefficient method. I'm sure we will be learning other methods as the class advances.

Thanks again
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top