Temperature(thermal radiation transfer)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ajwrighter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net thermal radiation transfer rate for a solid cylinder with specific dimensions and emissivity in a given environment. The initial calculation for the thermal radiation transfer rate P1 was found to be incorrect due to the use of an erroneous formula. The correct approach involves using the temperature difference in the form of (T^4 - Tenv^4). After resolving the issue, the ratio of thermal radiation transfer rates P2/P1 was confirmed to be 2.87. The problem is now considered resolved, highlighting the importance of accurate equations in thermal radiation calculations.
Ajwrighter
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
1. A solid cylinder of radius r1 = 2.3 cm, length h1 = 4.2 cm, emissivity 0.88, and temperature 24°C is suspended in an environment of temperature 55°C. (a) What is the cylinder's net thermal radiation transfer rate P1? (b) If the cylinder is stretched until its radius is r2 = 0.52 cm, its net thermal radiation transfer rate becomes P2. What is the ratio P2/P1?
2. P1 = (\sigma) (\epsilon) A1(Tenv4 - T4)

A1 = 2(\pi) r12 + 2 (\pi) r h

3. A1 = 9.393362*10-3m2
P1 = (5.67*10-8)(.88)(9.393362*10-3)((273+55)4-(273+24)4)) = 1.77W
I have (b) .. but for some reason (a) is wrong.. here is answer for (b) \frac{P2}{P1} = 2.87
.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I just did it in mathmatica .. and it gave the same answer .. If
my intuition is incorrect then the only possible solution would be
that P1 is somehow =(\sigma) (\epsilon) A1((24+273)4) ... but that's not how the question reads
 
I asked a friend he agrees with me.. but are we both wrong? not sure why the answer is considered wrong
 
had another person agree.. anyway I could get someone to review this problem and confirm?
 
any attempts?
 
ok I've resolved the problem. Both the book, and their online website have two distinct wrong equations to use.. The correct one would involve flipping the Tenv^4 with the T^4.. so it would read (T^4 - Tenv^4). So, I dub this problem as resolved in case anyone was interested.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top