Tension force of a thread in a complex structure of six masless rods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension force in a system of six massless rods, initially leading to the conclusion that T = mg based on symmetry and force balance. However, a participant corrects this, suggesting that if the thread is considered extensible, the relationship should yield T = 4mg instead. The conversation highlights the importance of defining variables such as mass (m), spring constant (k), and the change in length (Δl) in the context of gravitational forces and tension. Clarification is sought regarding whether the changes in length for the spring and mass are equal, ultimately confirming that for the mass, the change in height corresponds to 2Δl. The thread emphasizes the need for precise notation and understanding in solving complex tension problems.
Kino Physics
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
On a weightless structure of articulated rods, a weight with mass 𝑚 is suspended. What is the tension force T of the red thread? The six rods form two identical diamonds.
Relevant Equations
Newton's Second Law; Law of Conservation of energy ( potentially)
tension_stupid.PNG

At first I tried solving the problemteh following way:
Due to symmetry let the rods connected to the green rod have tension forces in magnitde T1 => mg = 2T1cos(a), where a is half the angle formed by the two rods. From tere I got an expression from the longer rods in the force projected by them is T2 in magnitude, which is equal to T1 due to the balance of forces in the x direction in the joint of the short and long rods , such that T1sin(a)=T2sin(a) and from there I get that T =mg.
However if I assume that teh thread is extensible and solve the balance of forces with the thread acing as a spring by integration the work of the gravitational force I get that k(dl)^2/2= mg(2dl).
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Kino Physics , :welcome: !
Kino Physics said:
T =mg
is the wrong answer ...

You may assume the red thread is inextensible. And if you don't want that, then still the answer should be inependent of ##k##.

Kino Physics said:
k(dl)^2/2= mg(2dl)
$$ k (\Delta l)^2/2 = 2mg\Delta l\ \ \ ?$$is hard to read and unfinished: there is a relationship between ##\Delta l## and mg
 
  • Like
Likes Kino Physics
Thak you for the swift reply! As you corretly guessed I meant to write
$$ k (\Delta l)^2/2 = 2mg\Delta l\ \ \ $$ And from there to derive that T=4mg
I am sorry for the inconvinience!
 
No reason to apologise !
But you could do me a favour and explain the symbols ...
 
  • Like
Likes Kino Physics
m is the mass of the weight
k is the spring constant
$$ \Delta l $$ is the diffrence between the unextended diagonal of the square that got stretched to a rhombus and the long diagonal of the rombus
g is the gravitational accelaration
This is the notation I used.
If you could give insight on the methods used to derive a solution involving an inextensive thread that would be very helpful! Thanks in advance!
 
My question was a disguised way to let you look again at ##\Delta l## for the spring and ##\Delta l## for the mass ... are they really equal ?

Goole pantograph :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Kino Physics
For the mass the change in height is equal to 2##\Delta l## . :)
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Well done !
 
  • Like
Likes Kino Physics
Thanks for the help!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #10
You are welcome. It's fun to help ..
 
Back
Top