Textbook recommendations for a high school math student

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding suitable mathematics textbooks for A-Level students who desire a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts rather than mere memorization. Recommendations include Bostock and Chandler's series for A-Level content, Gelfand's accessible texts, and Allendoefer and Oakley's "Principles of Mathematics." For rigorous pre-calculus, Lang's "Basic Mathematics" is suggested, while Lang's "A First Course in Calculus" is recommended as preparation for Spivak's calculus, which is noted for its challenging nature. Additionally, resources for proof writing such as Velleman's "How To Prove It" and Halmos's "Naive Set Theory" are advised to enhance understanding of mathematical proofs. The overall aim is to provide a selection of texts that balance rigor with accessibility, catering to the student's needs for both A-Level and university-level mathematics.
AsherA123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
My brother is currently doing his AS/A-Levels (11th - 12th grade) for maths and further maths. However he is unsatisfied with his textbooks as they focus purely on memorisation and don't really explain the mathematics behind concepts. He wants textbooks that not only teach the content but also have detailed explanations and focus on the proofs instead of the memorisation of facts. He doesn't mind if the textbooks contain university content, he doesn't even mind if they are university textbooks! Here is all the content he needs to learn:

http://oi59.tinypic.com/xqc66f.jpg
http://oi61.tinypic.com/29erh9f.jpg
http://oi61.tinypic.com/k0g481.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For A-level mathematics one cannot go far wrong with the series of books by Bostock and Chandler, though they were written for a slightly older and tougher specification. If I remember correctly they contain most if not all of the content needed for current A-Level Maths plus extra. Other options include the series of books by Gelfand on mathematics, which whilst accessible by GCSE students are still pleasant reads even for those at the A-level standard. Allendoefer and Oakley also have a text called "Principles of Mathematics" which doesn't perfectly align with the A-level specification, but that which it does cover it does an excellent job on. There are a large number of pre-calculus books in the US which have a lot of overlap with the non-calculus part of maths A-level, however I am not too familiar with these, although I have heard both Sullivan and Axler have written reasonably good texts. My final suggestion that excludes Calculus will be Basic Mathematics by Lang, which is in my opinion the most stretching of the books I have listed and more akin to a University level course in "pre-calculus" topics. Beyond this I feel Spivak's calculus is an excellent book for stretching talented students whilst also blending rather well with some of the pure and further A-level modules. Be warned though, if it is his first exposure to rigorous University style maths it may prove discouragingly difficult. It is helpful to have a teacher on hand for guidance in some parts, and I would also suggest that he read up on writing and constructing proofs if he does not have prior familiarity with this, to this end both How To Prove It by Velleman and Naive Set Theory by Halmos are very useful. Working through Lang's Basic Mathematics would also be good preparation for a text like Spivak. I personally elected to work through another of Lang's books, A First Course in Calculus, before approaching Spivak as I feel it can help to have a handle on some of the material first, there is certainly no shame in doing so as Spivak's text has oft been called more of an introduction to analysis than calculus, thus that book is another recommendation from me. Hopefully that should give your brother a fair selection of texts to examine and pick from. ;)

My overall suggested list:

A-level syllabus: Bostock and Chandler.
Rigorous Pre-calculus: Basic Mathematics by Lang.
Calculus: A First Course in Calculus by Lang.
Proof Writing: How To Prove it by Velleman and Naive Set Theory by Halmos.
Rigorous Calculus (essentially analysis): Calculus by Spivak.
 
IDValour said:
For A-level mathematics one cannot go far wrong with the series of books by Bostock and Chandler, though they were written for a slightly older and tougher specification. If I remember correctly they contain most if not all of the content needed for current A-Level Maths plus extra. Other options include the series of books by Gelfand on mathematics, which whilst accessible by GCSE students are still pleasant reads even for those at the A-level standard. Allendoefer and Oakley also have a text called "Principles of Mathematics" which doesn't perfectly align with the A-level specification, but that which it does cover it does an excellent job on. There are a large number of pre-calculus books in the US which have a lot of overlap with the non-calculus part of maths A-level, however I am not too familiar with these, although I have heard both Sullivan and Axler have written reasonably good texts. My final suggestion that excludes Calculus will be Basic Mathematics by Lang, which is in my opinion the most stretching of the books I have listed and more akin to a University level course in "pre-calculus" topics. Beyond this I feel Spivak's calculus is an excellent book for stretching talented students whilst also blending rather well with some of the pure and further A-level modules. Be warned though, if it is his first exposure to rigorous University style maths it may prove discouragingly difficult. It is helpful to have a teacher on hand for guidance in some parts, and I would also suggest that he read up on writing and constructing proofs if he does not have prior familiarity with this, to this end both How To Prove It by Velleman and Naive Set Theory by Halmos are very useful. Working through Lang's Basic Mathematics would also be good preparation for a text like Spivak. I personally elected to work through another of Lang's books, A First Course in Calculus, before approaching Spivak as I feel it can help to have a handle on some of the material first, there is certainly no shame in doing so as Spivak's text has oft been called more of an introduction to analysis than calculus, thus that book is another recommendation from me. Hopefully that should give your brother a fair selection of texts to examine and pick from. ;)

My overall suggested list:

A-level syllabus: Bostock and Chandler.
Rigorous Pre-calculus: Basic Mathematics by Lang.
Calculus: A First Course in Calculus by Lang.
Proof Writing: How To Prove it by Velleman and Naive Set Theory by Halmos.
Rigorous Calculus (essentially analysis): Calculus by Spivak.

Thank you for that detailed response! I'll pass on your suggestions to my brother and let you know how it goes! :)
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Back
Top