The Acceleration Due To Gravity

AI Thread Summary
To analyze the acceleration due to gravity, use the formula a = 2y/t², where y is the distance traveled and t is the time. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying this formula to avoid circular logic in calculations. Participants recall their own experiences with similar labs, emphasizing the need to ensure that gravity is not mistakenly included in the calculations. The goal is to accurately determine the acceleration of gravity based on the provided data. Proper analysis will yield a value close to 9.8 m/s², reflecting standard gravitational acceleration.
Snake
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have this lab. I have all the data but I need help w/ the analysis. How would I answer number one?
http://upload.mrtriggahappy.com/files/1/School/Physics/1.jpg
http://upload.mrtriggahappy.com/files/1/School/Physics/2.jpg
http://upload.mrtriggahappy.com/files/1/School/Physics/3.jpg
http://upload.mrtriggahappy.com/files/1/School/Physics/4.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I think you were suppose to calculate the acceleration using the data given. You have the distance traveled and the time so you just plug Y and t into determine gravity. You already put gravity in the equation when you were suppose to calculate it.
 
By question 1, do you mean determine the acceleration of gravity?

If one has distance and time, and one uses y = 1/2 a t2, then

a = 2y/t2
 
I remember doing this lab back in intro to mechanics... I am sure we found a way to screw up gravity... wait no no... we had exaaaaaaaaaaaactly 9.8...whaever the rest of the numbers are for 5 digits. Of course, then we realized we had accidently thrown in gravity somewhere and the calculation was circular logic.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Textbook 'The Physics of Waves': Linearity of Forced Oscillator
Replies
6
Views
824
Pulley system problem: 6 Pulleys and 1 Mass
Replies
5
Views
864
Block tied to a fixed string on an accelerating wedge
Replies
37
Views
2K
Atwood's with a cylinder - Rotational Motion
Replies
13
Views
855
Please explain this suggested solution for the field inside a charged hollow sphere
Replies
17
Views
1K
Doubt regarding View factor/shape factor of infinite inclined plate
Replies
3
Views
701
Is the Solution for Rotation of Spherical Mirrors Incorrect?
Replies
16
Views
1K
Relation between Friction, Velocity, and Acceleration
Replies
16
Views
925
Moments Question (IWTSE.org) -- Three balances and two masses
Replies
4
Views
1K
Question about uniform charge distribution
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top