The acceleration of a massless pulley in a double Atwood machine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the acceleration of a massless pulley in a double Atwood machine. It clarifies that a massless pulley does not require torque to accelerate, as the tension on either side remains equal. Additionally, it emphasizes that a massless object has zero net force according to Newton's second law, leading to the conclusion that acceleration can occur without a net force acting on the pulley. A visual representation of the system is recommended for better understanding. The explanation resolves the initial doubts regarding the mechanics of the massless pulley.
UnPetitGarcon
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Calculating the acceleration of pulley B
Relevant Equations
F=ma
So there is a textbook physics question in which it asks us to calculate the acceleration of pulley B(which is massless). This exact question was posted and asked previously in this thread. However, it didn't discuss my doubt. To be exact, the question I have troubles with is (b).
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/double-atwoods-machine.882491/
How on Earth is it even possible to accelerate a massless pulley? When setting up equations, we can reach to the conclusion that the tension in String C equals to the two tensions in String A so that there is no acceleration. How come there is acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UnPetitGarcon said:
Problem Statement: Calculating the acceleration of pulley B
Relevant Equations: F=ma

So there is a textbook physics question in which it asks us to calculate the acceleration of pulley B(which is massless). This exact question was posted and asked previously in this thread. However, it didn't discuss my doubt. To be exact, the question I have troubles with is (b).
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/double-atwoods-machine.882491/
How on Earth is it even possible to accelerate a massless pulley? When setting up equations, we can reach to the conclusion that the tension in String C equals to the two tensions in String A so that there is no acceleration. How come there is acceleration?
It's very helpful to include a sketch of the system in question. Here's a snip of the figure in the thread you refer to.
1564894782589.png


Two issues here:
One is that it takes no torque to accelerate a massless pulley.

Therefore, the tension in string A is the same on both sides o pulley B. Likewise, the tension in string C is the same on both sides o pulley D.

The other issue is that it takes no (zero) net force to accelerate any massless object. So net force on any massless object is zero. This follows from Newton's 2nd Law: ##\vec F _\text{net} = m \vec a##. So that if ##m=0## then ##\vec F _\text{net}## must be zero.
 
SammyS said:
It's very helpful to include a sketch of the system in question. Here's a snip of the figure in the thread you refer to.
View attachment 247590

Two issues here:
One is that it takes no torque to accelerate a massless pulley.

Therefore, the tension in string A is the same on both sides o pulley B. Likewise, the tension in string C is the same on both sides o pulley D.

The other issue is that it takes no (zero) net force to accelerate any massless object. So net force on any massless object is zero. This follows from Newton's 2nd Law: ##\vec F _\text{net} = m \vec a##. So that if ##m=0## then ##\vec F _\text{net}## must be zero.
Thanks for reply! Got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top