The angular acceleration and period of a pulsar

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular acceleration and period of a pulsar using the formulas T = 2π/ω and ω = 2π/T. The calculated angular acceleration is α = -2π/(2.94*10^-15)^2, resulting in a value of 7.27*10^29 rad/s². Participants express confusion about representing an indefinitely increasing period and the implications of a constant angular acceleration. Clarifications are provided on the need to assume constant angular acceleration to determine when angular speed reaches zero and to backtrack to find the initial angular speed and corresponding period. The conversation emphasizes careful substitution and understanding of the formulas involved.
Ursa
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a radio beam the way a lighthouse emits a light beam. We receive a radio pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. Suppose a pulsar has a period of rotation of T = 0.0178 s that is increasing at the rate of 9.27 x 10-8 s/y. (a) What is the pulsar's angular acceleration ? (b) If is constant, how many years from now will the pulsar stop rotating? (c) Suppose the pulsar originated in a supernova explosion seen 1160 years ago. Assuming constant \alpha , find the initial T
Relevant Equations
T=\frac {2\pi}{\omega}
for (a) ##T=\frac {2\pi}{\omega}##
$$\omega=\frac {2\pi}{T}$$
$$\frac{d \omega}{dt}=\frac {-2\pi}{T^2} \frac {dT}{dt} $$
$$\alpha=\frac {-2\pi}{(2.94*10^-15)^2} = 7.27*10^29 rad/s^2$$

for (b) I'm understand that it's infinity, because the period is increasing indefinitely, so it's slowing down forever.
But I don't know how to express that in formula, and infinity is not something I can input in the homework software.
So I must be wrong about it, but don't know how to get the correct answer.

(c) I don't have anything here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a is wrong - do your substitution more carefully.
In b they are asking you to assume the angular acceleration is constant - not dT/dt. If you have a constant negative α, and know the angular speed now, you can work out when the angular speed becomes zero.
For c you can likewise work backwards and calculate what the angular speed was initially, then convert that to a value of T.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top