The Boltzmann distribution of uniformly spaced energy levels

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the fraction of particles in the ground state of a system with uniformly spaced energy levels using the Boltzmann distribution at a temperature of 300K. The user derived an expression for the energy state based on the spacing of 3.2x10^-10 J and attempted to apply the Boltzmann distribution formula. However, they encountered an issue resulting in a negative value for the number of particles in the ground state, indicating a mistake in their calculations. A response pointed out that there were missing minus signs in the Boltzmann distribution function, which could have contributed to the error. The user acknowledged the typo but maintained that their final answer remained unchanged.
corr0105
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The question states:
A system has energy levels uniformly spaced at 3.2x10^-10 J apart. Thepopulations of the energy levels are given by the Boltzmann distribution. What fraction of particles is in the ground state at T=300K.

I know that the Boltzmann distribution is:
_{}p*j=probability that a particle is in state j
=exp(-_{}Ej/KT) / \sumexp(-_{}Ej/KT)

I created my own expression for the energy state Ej:
_{}Ej=3.2x10^-20(j-1)
My thought process behind this was that to get the energy state of each level you have to multiply by the space between each level times 1 minus the level. In other words, E1=0*3.2x10^-20, E2=1(3.2x10^-10)...etc.

I set this pj* equal to: # particles in ground state (g) / # states (t)
Assuming that the particles in the ground state would have energy E=0 I plugged all of the given values into the equation: T=300, Ej=0, K=boltzmann's constant. Because the problem did not give the number of states my answer is in terms of t. I got an answer of:
-0.25875/(1+t)
Obviously this is wrong because you cannot have a negative number of particles.


ANY IDEA WHAT I'VE DONE WRONG?
thanks in advance for any help
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Your Boltzmann distribution function has a couple of minus signs missing.
 
I'm sorry, you are correct. The post has been edited. It was a typo, but the answer I got still stands.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top