The electric field of infinite line charges and infinite sheet of charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field (E) due to infinite line charges and sheets of charge. For the first question, the correct electric fields at specified points were identified as E=45z V/m and E=10.8y + 36.9z V/m, with confusion about the variables used in the equations. Participants emphasized the importance of using the superposition principle and requested detailed step-by-step calculations to clarify misunderstandings. In the second question, the approach to calculating the electric field from multiple sheets of charge was also discussed, with requests for clarification on the application of the relevant formulas. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges in applying electrostatic principles and the need for clear calculations.
dada130500015
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Q1,Infinite uniform line charges of 5 nC/m lie along the x and y axes in free space. Find E at (a), P(0, 0 , 4); and (b), P (0 ,3 , 4)


Q2, Three infinite uniform sheets of charge are located in free space as follows: 3 nC/m2 at z= -4, 6 nC/m2 at z=1, -8 nC/m2 at z=4. Find E at point P (2,5,-5)

Homework Equations


E=ρL/2∏ε0ρ
Q1,I used this got: a), E=22.5z V/m
b), E=10.8y + 14.4z V/m
Q2, I used E= ρ/2ε0

The Attempt at a Solution


Q1, The right answer is a), E=45z V/m b), E = 10.8y+36.9z V/m


I really confused in this topic, So wish your guys help me. Thanks a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes Kaushik ss
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the \rho in the denominator of your Eline function supposed to be the density? Or is it the displacement from the line of charge? Also, it would be helpful if you could show your calculations step-by-step because I get the correct answer for (a) using

E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}r}

as you had there, combined with the superposition principle. And I got the correct answer for (b) using the superposition principle and the same function you listed of

E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}

So I don't know if you just aren't superposing the charge distributions' respective fields properly or if you made some incorrect substitutions. So post your calculations step-by-step so we can actually see where you might be going wrong.
 
In Q1, the ρ is the density i think.
Here is the step for Q1:
a), E=ρL/2∏ε0ρ
= (5*10-9/2*∏*ε0*42)*4z
=22.5z V/m

b), E={5*10-9/2*∏*ε0*(32+42)}*(3y+4z)
=10.8y + 14.4z V/m


For Q2, i still can't got the answer that using the E=σ/2ϵ0,
in this question i just calculate each of three with the formula above and then add them to find the E. could you show me the step?
 
wjswanson said:
is the \rho in the denominator of your eline function supposed to be the density? Or is it the displacement from the line of charge? Also, it would be helpful if you could show your calculations step-by-step because i get the correct answer for (a) using

e = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}r}

as you had there, combined with the superposition principle. And i got the correct answer for (b) using the superposition principle and the same function you listed of

e = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_{0}}

so i don't know if you just aren't superposing the charge distributions' respective fields properly or if you made some incorrect substitutions. So post your calculations step-by-step so we can actually see where you might be going wrong.

In Q1, the ρ is the density i think.
Here is the step for Q1:
a), E=ρL/2∏ε0ρ
= (5*10-9/2*∏*ε0*42)*4z
=22.5z V/m

b), E={5*10-9/2*∏*ε0*(32+42)}*(3y+4z)
=10.8y + 14.4z V/m


For Q2, i still can't got the answer that using the E=σ/2ϵ0,
in this question i just calculate each of three with the formula above and then add them to find the E. could you show me the step?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top