The electricfield inside a board

  • Thread starter Thread starter axcelenator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Board
axcelenator
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
a board charged with superficial density σ is in YZ and X=0. another board with a thickness of D(0<X<D) sticks to him with a volumed density ρ(x,y,z)=μ*X. The electric field out of the charged area is zero.
I have to find the elec field inside the board:i made a little gauss cylinder inside the board and outdise him. and so the answer is: E=-2∏Kμ(D^2 - X^2). but, why don't I add to that expresion the electric field of the board chaged with σ? (2∏Kσ)

My second quetion if I have to find the difference between the potentials between (2D,0,0) and (-2D,0,0) what should I do If the elec field is 0 in this areas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference in potentials between (2D,0,0) and (-2D,0,0) is zero since the electric field is zero in those regions. You don't need to add the electric field of the charged board to the expression for the electric field inside the board because the electric field of the charged board is outside the board and does not contribute to the electric field inside the board.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top