The field due to multiple concentric solenoids with water

Jeremy_W
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


OK, so I am doing research this semester and I am working with the Faraday effect. For my magnetic field, we are using a large solenoid that is comprised of 13 concentric solenoids each of which has the same number of coils per unit length. In between each of these layers there are layers of water to cool the wires to prevent overheating and of course in the middle is the substance which the light will pass through. However, for this calculation, I will assume it to be a vacuum (under the instruction of the professor). So I need to calculate the magnetic field strength.

Homework Equations


Ampere's Law: ∫B.dsOJ
Magnetic Field of one solenoid with a non-vacuum core: B = μnI

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I read in another thread that the magnetic field in the center is simply the magnetic field due to the inner most one. And when I use Ampere's Law, I get the same thing. So basically, I am getting:

B = μ ninner I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If B is just due to the most inner one, then throw away the other solenoids :biggrin:
Imagine that all the solenoids have nearly the same radius, then if you stand in the center, what you see is one solenoid with current 13I, not I.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top