The first and second law of thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The first law of thermodynamics states that the energy input into a system equals the energy output when a complete cycle occurs. In contrast, the second law emphasizes that to obtain useful work, the energy input must exceed the energy output, indicating that some energy is always lost as waste heat. This means that while energy is conserved, achieving practical work requires additional energy beyond what is returned. Therefore, no energy conversion process can be 100% efficient. Understanding these laws clarifies the relationship between energy conservation and the necessity of additional energy for useful work.
jamesd2008
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
In my thermodynamics book it states that the first law is,

" When a system undergoes a complete cycle the net heat supplied plus the net work input is zero"

And then it states that for the second law,

"In any complete cycle the gross heat supplied plus the net work input must be greater than zero"

Are these not contradicting each other or am I miss understanding the gross and net aspects? Could someone please help me try to understand?

Thanks in advance
James
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The first law, as you have quoted, is pretty much saying "the energy you put in must be equal to the energy you get back out again".

The second law says "while the first law still applies, to get something useful out, you need to put the same amount in, plus a bit more".

The Wikipedia article is pretty good.
 
Thats great thanks for your input, So although the energy is conserved, to gain practical useful work extra heat is needed?
 
jamesd2008 said:
Thats great thanks for your input, So although the energy is conserved, to gain practical useful work extra heat is needed?

That is correct. In other words, you can never have an energy conversion device or process which is 100% efficient.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top