The first Law of Thermodynamics seems confusing to me.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the first law of thermodynamics and the confusion surrounding different equations and sign conventions. It clarifies that during adiabatic expansion, where heat transfer (Q) is zero, the internal energy (ΔU) decreases as work (W) is done by the system. Participants emphasize that the pressure is not constant during adiabatic processes, which invalidates the use of the ideal gas equation for calculating changes in internal energy. The distinction between adiabatic and constant pressure processes is critical, as the latter involves heat transfer that increases internal energy. Overall, understanding these concepts is essential for accurately applying thermodynamic principles.
marcelnv
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The first law of thermodynamic is sometimes written as
\DeltaU = \DeltaQ-P \DeltaV and sometimes as \DeltaU = Q+W, and sometimes \DeltaU = Q - W. I am confused about all these.
I also know that W is positive when the system in question does work to its surrounding and negative otherwise. Looking at \DeltaU = \DeltaQ-P \DeltaV, i want to conclude that every expansion entails positive work and every compression negative work. I'm I correct to do so?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yep, that's right.
 
Thanks to all for your help. I am actually grabbing some sense out of your comments.
My problem still remains.
Let's consider for instance an Adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas. We have the first law:
\DeltaU = Q - W.
Now Adiabatic process \Rightarrow Q = 0, hence
\DeltaU = - W.
But W = P \DeltaV \succ 0 for expansion; assuming constant P.
This Would mean \DeltaU \prec 0 i.e Internal energy decreases, when the gas expands at constant pressure.
Now considering the equation of state of an ideal gas
U = \frac{3}{2} PV \Rightarrow \DeltaU =\frac{3}{2} P\DeltaV.
Expansion would mean \DeltaV \succ 0, hence
\DeltaU \succ 0 , so that the internal energy increases in this case.

Is there something I'm getting wrong in the above reasoning?
Thanks for helping.
 
You cannot use PV=nRT directly for an adiabatic expansion since temperature is not constant so you cannot integrate the first law.

For adiabatic first law

dq=0; dU=dw=-PdV

dw = CvdT

-PdV = CvdT

{C_v}dT + PdV = 0

{C_v}\frac{{dT}}{T} + nR\frac{{dV}}{V} = 0

integrating between initial and final temps and initial and final volumes

{C_v}\ln \frac{{{T_2}}}{{{T_1}}} + nR\ln \frac{{{V_2}}}{{{V_1}}} = 0

if \gamma = \frac{{{C_p}}}{{{C_v}}}

and nR = Cp - Cv

then we can arrive at

\frac{{{T_1}}}{{{T_2}}} = {\left( {\frac{{{V_2}}}{{{V_1}}}} \right)^{\gamma - 1}}

and

PV\gamma = constant
 
Last edited:
It seems that you are mixing the adiabatic and constant pressure processes.
In the adiabatic expansion the internal energy decreases. The pressure is not constant so you cannot write the change in U as 3/2 P*Delta V.

For constant pressure expansion heat must be transferred to the gas. The internal energy of the ideal gas will increase in this case.
 
Been around 40 years since I took basic physics in college and while I remember doing some examples of insulation values / energy conduction, I doubt I could to the math now even if I could find the formulas. I have some some corrugated plastic sheet (think of the plastic signs you see on the side of the road) that is used in bee hives. Also have some used in a green house though a bit different in dimensions than this example but the general approach should still apply. Typically, both...
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Back
Top