First law of thermodynamics of gas

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the first law of thermodynamics as it applies to a gas expanding against a constant external pressure. Participants explore the implications of work done by and on the system, particularly in the context of a piston mechanism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants state the first law as ΔU = Q + W, with a sign convention where work done by the system is negative and work done on the system is positive.
  • One participant questions whether pulling the piston while the gas expands results in positive work done on the system, despite the gas doing work, and whether this scenario violates the first law.
  • Another participant asserts that external actions do not change the work done by the system, emphasizing that the system's expansion or compression dictates whether work is done by or on it.
  • A participant suggests that for the scenario to hold, the gas would need to have a negative pressure, otherwise both the gas and the external force would be doing positive work, potentially violating conservation laws.
  • Further elaboration includes a force balance on a frictionless, massless piston, detailing how the tension and atmospheric pressure interact with the gas pressure, affecting the work calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of external forces on the work done by the gas and the interpretation of the first law of thermodynamics. No consensus is reached regarding the scenario presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions regarding the mass of the piston and the nature of the pressures involved, which may affect the interpretation of work and energy transfer in the system.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
The first law can be stated as ΔU = Q + W and we adopt a sign convention as follows, if the system under study does work then W is negative and if work is done on the system W is positive.
Now consider the example of a gas expanding against a constant external pressure p. W would be negative as the gas does work, and from a classical mechanics approach this can be explained by imagining the external force from pressure moving through a displacement that is in an opposite direction to the force, so the work done ON the system is negative. But picture this; what if while the gas expands, i pull the piston so my force is in the same direction as the force by the gas, does that mean work done on the system is positive although the gas is clearly doing work? Would that violate the first law of thermodynamics?
 
Science news on Phys.org
What you do outside of the system is your own work and not that of the system. If the system is expanding it is doing work, and if it is being compressed than work is being done on it.
Your scenario is the same as a piston with weights on it. With more weight, with the system expanding, it is doing more more than if there is less weight on the piston. By your pulling on the piston, that would be the same as less weight on the piston.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
Now consider the example of a gas expanding against a constant external pressure p. W would be negative as the gas does work, and from a classical mechanics approach this can be explained by imagining the external force from pressure moving through a displacement that is in an opposite direction to the force, so the work done ON the system is negative. But picture this; what if while the gas expands, i pull the piston so my force is in the same direction as the force by the gas, does that mean work done on the system is positive although the gas is clearly doing work? Would that violate the first law of thermodynamics?

You would have to arrange for the gas in the cylinder to have a negative pressure. Otherwise both you and the gas would be doing positive work on the piston. If the piston is massless (as is implied), that would violate conservation of momentum along with the first law of thermodynamics.

If the piston has mass, it will merely be accelerated, thereby balancing the books for both energy and momentum.
 
jbriggs444, how would this violate the first law of thermodynamics and the conservation of momentum?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
The first law can be stated as ΔU = Q + W and we adopt a sign convention as follows, if the system under study does work then W is negative and if work is done on the system W is positive.
Now consider the example of a gas expanding against a constant external pressure p. W would be negative as the gas does work, and from a classical mechanics approach this can be explained by imagining the external force from pressure moving through a displacement that is in an opposite direction to the force, so the work done ON the system is negative. But picture this; what if while the gas expands, i pull the piston so my force is in the same direction as the force by the gas, does that mean work done on the system is positive although the gas is clearly doing work? Would that violate the first law of thermodynamics?

From the force balance on a frictionless, massless piston, the tension you are pulling with is equal to the atmospheric pressure on your side of the piston times the area of the piston, minus the gas pressure within the cylinder on the other side of the piston times the area of the piston. The work you are doing on the piston is TAd, where T is the tension, and A is the piston area, where d is the displacement of the piston. The work being done on the gas on the other side of the piston is (T-pa)Ad, where pa is atmospheric pressure. This is minus he work done by the system on its surroundings, which, in this case, occurs at the inside face of the piston. So part of the work you are doing to pull the piston out is to push back the atmosphere on your side of the piston. But this is not the work you are doing on the gas on the other side of the piston or the work that the gas is doing on its surroundings.

Chet
 
Chet,
Good post
Much like I said but way more explanatory.
Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
958
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K