The Importance of Symmetry in Stress Tensors

AI Thread Summary
A symmetric stress tensor is essential because a nonsymmetric tensor indicates an interior source of stress energy, as per Cauchy's second law of motion. The components of the stress-energy tensor represent energy density and momentum flows, with off-diagonal elements indicating shear stresses. In general relativity, the stress-energy tensor typically describes perfect fluids, such as dust or radiation, which have specific properties regarding pressure and shear stress. Understanding the implications of a nonsymmetric tensor is crucial for accurately modeling physical systems. This discussion highlights the importance of symmetry in stress tensors within the context of physics and general relativity.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Why stress tensor must be symmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A nonsymmetric stress tensor means that there is an interior source of stress energy (Cauchy's second law of motion).
 
Some reference for this perhaps? What that means physically? -Example!
 
The T00 component of the stress energy tensor is energy density, the T11, T22, T33 (the diagonal components) are momentum flows or pressures. The off diagonals represent shear stresses and as Andy has pointed out a non-symmetric tensor means there is an interior source of energy. In GR this tensor usually represents a perfect fluid which is either dust (zero pressures) or radiation which is a fluid with pressure but no shear stress.
 
I don't understand this. Is there some other way. If \hat{N} is symmetric then \hat{N}=\hat{N}^*. Maybe from this?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top