The Lagrangian Solution of an LC Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an LC circuit using the Lagrangian formulation, where charge q is treated as the generalized coordinate. The inductor's energy is classified as kinetic energy due to its similarity to the kinetic energy term, while the capacitor's energy is considered potential energy. The total energy is represented by the Hamiltonian, and the difference between the two energy types defines the Lagrangian. It is emphasized that while capacitors can store energy, inductors only temporarily store energy in a magnetic field when in motion. The classification of energy types in this context is debated but ultimately does not affect the overall analysis.
nmbr28albert
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
One way to solve the simple LC circuit with 1 inductor and 1 capacitor is to use the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics and consider charge q as the generalized coordinate. When writing down your Lagrangian, the energy of the inductor \frac{1}{2}L(\frac{dq}{dt})^2 is treated as the kinetic energy, and the energy of the capacitor \frac{q^2}{2C} is treated as the potential. My first instinct is to treat the inductor energy as also potential energy. Why is it considered kinetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it is similar to the kinetic energy i.e the term (dq/dt)^2 is similar to v^2. The definition of velocity v in lagrangian mechanics is the first derivative wrt time, of the generalized coordinate right?
 
I don't think it matters which you call what.

You have two terms. The sum is the Hamiltonian (total energy) and the difference is the Lagrangian. The sign of the difference shouldn't make any difference.

When you have three or more terms, you need to be more careful with signs.
 
that sounds right

on linear motion along coordinate x, velocity is dx/dt, i.e., the first derivattive. Kinetic energy is (1/2)mv^2 or one half of constant m times the square of the first derivative of the generalized coordinate.

Besides, capacitors can actually store energy and inductors cannot, at least not permanently, only temporarily in the magnetic field but things need to be in motion (changing).

my 2 cents
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top