The math around the windbag or Bernoulli bag experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical principles behind the windbag or Bernoulli bag experiment, specifically the relationship between the mass flow rates of air exiting and entering the bag. It highlights that the mass flow rate of air exiting the mouth, M1, affects the mass flow rate entering the bag, M2, due to the principles of compressible flow. The reduction in pressure caused by high-velocity air creates a vacuum that draws surrounding air into the bag. Participants seek a detailed explanation using equations and physics to clarify these concepts. Understanding these dynamics is essential for accurately analyzing the experiment's outcomes.
dillmon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
bernoulli%20bag400.jpg

What is the math behind this experiment? If the mass flow rate of the air coming out of the guy's mouth is M1, then what is the mass flow rate, M2, of of the air going into the bag?

I know that this is related to compressible flow. The explanations I have found on the internet are that since the pressure reduces because of the high velocity air, the surrounding air will also go through the opening of the airbag. I would like to see an expiation using equations and math and physics, or at least be pointed in the right direction. Thank You.
 

Attachments

  • bernoulli%20bag400.jpg
    bernoulli%20bag400.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 1,099
Physics news on Phys.org
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top