The transformer section in Flyback converter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the operation of the transformer in a Flyback converter within a switched-mode power supply (SMPS). It highlights that during operation, only one side of the transformer conducts at a time, and when switching off, a significant voltage spike can occur due to leakage inductance. However, if perfect coupling is assumed and leakage inductance is neglected, the primary current can theoretically be reduced to zero without causing a spike, as energy is redirected through the secondary circuit. The conversation emphasizes that the flyback transformer behaves differently from traditional transformers, functioning more like an inductor, as it maintains magnetic flux continuity through the secondary current. Understanding these principles is crucial for deeper comprehension of SMPS design and operation.
NexusN
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone,
I am now studying the Flyback converter as a component in a SMPS,
my question is on the transformer unit on the converter.
There are Primary side and Secondary side in the converter,
at any given moment only either of the sides conducts, that is, when Primary conducts, Secondary doesn't.

From the book I am reading now, on switching to the OFF state, huge spike can arise as a result of the leakage inductance.
Does it mean, if we assume perfect coupling and neglect the effect of leakage inductance, we can actually strictly cut the current in the primary side from a finite value to zero without causing a spike, as the energy is free-wheeled via the secondary circuit?
Thank you.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it mean, if we assume perfect coupling and neglect the effect of leakage inductance, we can actually strictly cut the current in the primary side from a finite value to zero without causing a spike, as the energy is free-wheeled via the secondary circuit?

Yes it does.

We often think in terms of "not being able to change the current in an inductor instantaneously", but more fundamentally it's about not being able to change the magnetic flux instantaneously. In the flyback transformer the flux that was produced by the primary current is maintained by the secondary current after switching, so there's no discontinuity.

It's important to realize that this makes a flyback transformer a very different beast compared to a normal voltage transformer, as the flyback tranny takes 100% of the load current through the magnetizing branch (compared with say 1% in a normal transformer). For this reason a flyback transformer is designed more like an inductor than a traditional transformer.
 
uart said:
Yes it does.

We often think in terms of "not being able to change the current in an inductor instantaneously", but more fundamentally it's about not being able to change the magnetic flux instantaneously. In the flyback transformer the flux that was produced by the primary current is maintained by the secondary current after switching, so there's no discontinuity.

It's important to realize that this makes a flyback transformer a very different beast compared to a normal voltage transformer, as the flyback tranny takes 100% of the load current through the magnetizing branch (compared with say 1% in a normal transformer). For this reason a flyback transformer is designed more like an inductor than a traditional transformer.

Thank you very much for the explanation,:-p
I think this is a very important definition I must understand before I can go deeper in SMPS,
I was struggled by the current definition in the past.
 
Thread 'PLL - How to find all the gains of a PI corrector and fix Ki ? MATLAB'
Hello everyone, it's not really for my homework (because I'm not at school anymore) but I'm new and I don't know how to start a new forum. I've never done automatic before and I need help. I have a 2nd ordre PLL on MATLAB, with an NCO and a PI corrector; the PLL works via the Mid/End algorithm (that's part is ok). I need to find the link between the theoretical formulas and their values in the code to find the value of the gain Ki, and possibly that of Kp if it's not correct. Unfortunately...
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Back
Top