The work required for adding a charge to an infinite charge distribution

Deeviance
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the energy required to add an additional charge to the chain
in the limit where the total number of charges approaches infinity.

So, I have a equidistant linear charge distribution like + - + - + -... where the total number of charges approaches infinity. The charges are being brought from an infinite distance to there spot in the charge distribution.

What is the energy required to add a charge on to the "end" of it?

Homework Equations



Electric force = k(Q1Q2)/d^2
work = Integral of (Fdot Dr) from path begin to path end

The Attempt at a Solution



I wish I could more here, but its one of these problems that I can't set up, so I can't really give an attempted solution but here are my thoughts.

(backed up by nothing but my intuition)

It will be a finite number as most of the force due to charge distribution will cancel out.

It will be close to the amount of energy required to add a charge to a single charge distribution because of the cancellation.
Any direction would be much appreciate.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use potential. The work equals q V.
V is an infinite sum of alternating sign with terms like 1/n.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top