The z coordinate of the center of mass of the box

AI Thread Summary
To find the center of mass of an open cubical box with edge length L = 97 cm, one must consider the mass distribution of the box's sides and bottom. The mass density, denoted as σ, can be used to calculate the mass of each face by multiplying it by the respective area. The center of mass for the four vertical sides can be treated as a particle of mass 4M located at the center, while the bottom contributes a mass M at its center. Combining these two components will yield the overall center of mass coordinates. The z coordinate specifically will be influenced by the absence of a top face, affecting the final calculations.
hateAleen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cubical box has been constructed from uniform metal plate of negligible thickness. The box is open at the top and has edge length L = 97 cm. Find (a) the x coordinate, (b) the y coordinate, and (c) the z coordinate of the center of mass of the box.

Homework Equations


rcom=(1/M)sum(mi*ri)


The Attempt at a Solution


I could not figure out what to do with a three dimensional object since we are not given a mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hateAleen said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I could not figure out what to do with a three dimensional object since we are not given a mass.

Assume some \sigma as the two dimensional mass density, that is, mass per unit area of the faces. Multiplying \sigma by area, you'll get the mass. I think you know where the CM of a rectangle is. Now, apply the formula you know.
 
If you assume that the mass of one side is M then the com of the four upright sides will correspond to a "particle" of mass 4M in the middle of the box. You now need to combine this with a "particle" of mass M in the middle of the bottom to get the overall com.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top