Theoretical question about wingless flight with a flight pack

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tabaristiio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flight Theoretical
AI Thread Summary
A power-to-weight ratio above 1.0 is necessary for a wingless flight pack to achieve horizontal flight. The horizontal thrust can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, where total thrust and weight are the key variables. For a combined weight of 300 pounds, a thrust of just over 301 pounds allows for slight horizontal movement. The discussion highlights that while humans can achieve horizontal speeds, such as a skydiver's 19 m/s, their efficiency as lifting bodies is limited. Overall, achieving effective horizontal flight with a jetpack involves careful consideration of thrust and weight dynamics.
Tabaristiio
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
What is the power to weight ratio required from a wingless augmented portable flight pack (jetpack) so that it can enable flight horizontally?

Assume that the jetpack and the user both weigh 300 pounds combined.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, if the power to weight ratio is above 1.0, it can fly horizontally. How fast horizontally depends on the ratio.

The horizontal component of thrust that is possible is given by the Pythagorean theorem, where the total thrust is the hypotenuse and the weight is one vertical side:
$$F = \sqrt{T^2-W^2}$$
where ##F## is the horizontal thrust, ##T## is the total thrust, and ##W## is the total weight.

So if the jet pack thrusted just 301 pounds, it could be tilted ever so slightly to impart a slight horizontal force to propel the wearer horizontally, but slowly.
 
I doubt humans make very good "lifting bodies" so +1 to what Anachronist said.
 
CWatters said:
I doubt humans make very good "lifting bodies" so +1 to what Anachronist said.

I guess it depends on what you mean by very good. A skydiver can reach horizontal speeds of 19 m/s while vertical speed is about 72 m/s, is that bad, good? Not good enough to land I suppose :-(

Cheers
 
Any glide slope less than 1:1 isn't even bad.
 
  • Like
Likes cosmik debris
CWatters said:
Any glide slope less than 1:1 isn't even bad.
That depends on the speed at which you hit the ground. :)
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top