Thermal Expansion of lead rod question

AI Thread Summary
A lead rod and a glass rod are initially the same length at 21.0° C, but when the lead rod is heated to 50.0° C, the glass rod must be heated to 280° C to match its length. The thermal expansion coefficients used were 29e-6 for lead and initially 3.25e-6 for glass, but a higher value of 9x10^-6 was required for the glass rod. The discussion highlighted that Pyrex glass, designed for lower thermal expansion, is not suitable for this calculation as it has a different coefficient. The procedure for calculating length changes due to temperature was confirmed to be correct. Understanding the thermal properties of different materials is essential for accurate calculations in thermal expansion scenarios.
Intrusionv2
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A lead rod and a common glass rod both have the same length when at 21.0° C. The lead rod is heated to 50.0° C. To what temperature must the glass rod be heated so that they are again at the same length?

I did this:

L = a*L0*T
a (thermal expansion) of lead = (29e-6)
a (thermal expansion) of glass pyrex = (3.25e-6)

[a(50-21)]lead = [a(Tf-21)]glass
Tf = 280° C.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you happen to know what temperature they're looking for?

Although it doesn't make a difference to the solution to this problem, for future reference you might take note that the length of the material that has undergone a temperature change should be

L_{new} = L_{old} (1 + \alpha \Delta T)

This is because the coefficient of expansion is based upon

\frac{\Delta L}{L} = \alpha \Delta T
 
Hey thanks for the reply, I actually got it worked out.

They wanted a larger value for alpha of glass than I had.

I thought that pyrex glass would be fine to use as alpha for a glass rod, guess not. They wanted 9x10^-6.

But other than that my procedure is good :)
 
Intrusionv2 said:
Hey thanks for the reply, I actually got it worked out.

They wanted a larger value for alpha of glass than I had.

I thought that pyrex glass would be fine to use as alpha for a glass rod, guess not. They wanted 9x10^-6.

But other than that my procedure is good :)

Ah yes. It might be of interest to note that Pyrex glass was developed to address thermal expansion issues -- it was designed to have a lower thermal expansion coefficient than "ordinary" glass. It also meant fewer breakages due to thermal stress in the lab as well as the kitchen!
 
gneill said:
Ah yes. It might be of interest to note that Pyrex glass was developed to address thermal expansion issues -- it was designed to have a lower thermal expansion coefficient than "ordinary" glass. It also meant fewer breakages due to thermal stress in the lab as well as the kitchen!

Makes sense, good to know!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top