Thermal expansion of steel tape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the thermal expansion of a steel tape measure and a brass rod when the temperature increases from 12°C to 45°C. Calculations show that the steel tape expands more than the brass rod, leading to a discrepancy in measurements. The steel tape's reading at 45°C is calculated to be approximately 102.063954 cm, while the brass rod's effective length on the steel tape at that temperature is about 101.9730888 cm. The confusion arises from interpreting what the tape measure will read versus the actual length of the brass rod, highlighting the importance of understanding how thermal expansion affects measurements. Ultimately, the problem illustrates the complexities of measuring lengths when both the measuring tool and the object being measured expand at different rates.
donjt81
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
A steel tape measure gives the length of a brass rod 102cm when both are at 12 degree C. What would the tape measure read (d) when the temperature increases to 45 degree C?
coeff of linear expansion of steel = 1.9 * 10 power -5
coeff of linear expansion of brass = 1.1 * 10 power -5
so this is my approach
deformation = coeff * change in temp * length

for the steel tape I get
deformation = 1.9 * 10 power -5 * (45-12) * 102
=.063954

for the brass rod i get
deformation = 1.1 * 10 power -5 * (45-12) * 102
=.037026

So now my question is
What would the tape measure read (d) when the temperature increases to 45 degree C?
the tape measure would read 102 + .063954 = 102.063954 (is this correct?)

then why would they give coess for brass rod. seems like i could have gotten this answer without that also.

please help

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer should definitely be less than 102cm.

Let's imagine for a moment that we have two rods that are both length 102 cm at 12 degrees - one steel, the other brass. If we heat both to 45 degrees, which will be longer, and what will the difference in their lengths be?
 
okay let's take a step back

I am confused about what they are asking for here.

the question says "What would the tape measure read (d) when the temperature increases to 45 degree C?"

are they asking
1. What is the final length of the steel tape at 45 degrees
OR
2. What is the final lenth of the brass rod at 45 degrees
OR
3. What is the difference between the final length of the steel tape and the final length of the brass rod.

From your comment it sounds like they are asking #3. is this correct.
 
Actually, what they're asking for is slightly different -- the problem is tricky because the length of the scale is changing.
Let's also assume (for now) that the steel scale reads true at 12 degrees C.
Then the number you have calculated is the length that a reading of 102 corresponds to on the scale at 45 degrees C. So the steel scale is no longer reading true at 45 degrees C. The question is asking what the brass rod will measure at on this un-true scale at 45 degrees C.
What I was trying to point out is that since the brass rod is expanding more slowly than the steel scale, the length of the brass rod will be less than the length of the scale at the 102 mark at 45 degrees.
 
whoa that was a tricky one. I am still not sure if i got it right but this is what i have...

in the case of the steel tape
old 102 = new 102.063954
this means that 1cm on the un-true scale will be equal to 102/102.063954 = .999373 on the true scale

in the case of the brass rod
102.037026 will now be = 102.037026 * .999373 = 101.9730888

so the length of the brass rod on the un-tru scale is 101.9730888

does that look right?
 
donjt81 said:
whoa that was a tricky one. I am still not sure if i got it right but this is what i have...
in the case of the steel tape
old 102 = new 102.063954
this means that 1cm on the un-true scale will be equal to 102/102.063954 = .999373 on the true scale
in the case of the brass rod
102.037026 will now be = 102.037026 * .999373 = 101.9730888
so the length of the brass rod on the un-tru scale is 101.9730888
does that look right?

Well, the number shoud be right.

The words are a bit confusing because you can't really assume that either of the scales is true in a problem like this, and it would be much easier to read if you had: "1cm on the true scale will be equal to .999373 on the un-true scale" rather than what you have.
 
thats true
that is a better way to put it.

thanks nate
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Back
Top