Thermal Expansion: Volume vs. Linear - 0.11L Spilled

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving thermal expansion of oil in a pot when heated from 15°C to 190°C. The participant initially calculated the spilled oil volume using volume expansion formulas but arrived at an incorrect result of 0.344 liters. After attempting to use linear expansion, they found the book's answer of 0.11 liters, which they questioned. The consensus suggests that the participant's approach was correct, and the discrepancy may stem from a misunderstanding in the problem's wording regarding the coefficients of expansion. The discussion concludes that the participant's calculations align with the principles of thermal expansion, indicating a potential error in the textbook.
Alex126
Messages
84
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A one-liter pot is completely filled with oil. Heat is applied to the pot&oil and the temperature rises from 15°C to 190°C. How much oil is spilled over?

The linear coefficient of thermal expansion for oil is 0.68*10-3; the one for the pot is 2.4*10-5

Homework Equations


Linear expansion = starting length * coefficient α * ΔTemperature
Volume expansion = starting volume * coefficient β * ΔT

Coefficient β = 3*α

The Attempt at a Solution


Since we're talking of a pot, and oil in the pot, I thought that we'd be dealing with volume expansion here. So I simply used the formulas, and got the wrong result (0.344 Liters).

Just as an attempt, I then tried doing the exercise with the linear expansion, and got the right (apparently, according to the book) result (0.11 Liters).

What's up with that? Shouldn't it be volume expansion here? The process I thought to be correct was as follows:

V = starting volume (1L)

Oil spilled = [Final oil volume] - [Final pot volume]
Final oil volume = V + volume expansion oil
Final pot volume = V + volume expansion pot
=> oil spilled = volume expansion oil - volume expansion pot

Volume expansion oil/pot = V * βoil/pot * (190-15)
β = 3α

So:
Volume expansion oil = 1*3*0.68*10-3*175 = 0.357
Volume expansion pot = 1*3*2.4*10-5*175 = 0.0126

=> oil spilled = 0.357-0.0126 = 0.344

If I were to "force" the right result (0.11), I would have to use a formula that reads this:

volume expansion = V * linear expansion coefficient * ΔT

Which doesn't make sense to me. So am I missing something, or am I right and the book authors made a mistake and the right answer is 0.344 after all? (Or maybe the error was in the text when they said "linear coefficient" when they actually meant "volume coefficient")
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alex126 said:
(Or maybe the error was in the text when they said "linear coefficient" when they actually meant "volume coefficient")
I think that's the error.

Your thinking is correct. (Look up the coefficient of expansion for oil and check.)
 
  • Like
Likes Alex126
Alright, thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top