Thermodynamical Equilibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gabriel Maia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
A cylinder has rigid, adiabatic and impermeable external walls. It is provided with a mobile internal ideal partition wall, dividing it in two volumes (A and B). Each volume is filled with an ideal monoatomic gas. Initially, the volume, pressure and temperature of A and B are identical (P0,V0,T0). A certain amount of heat is then introduced into A in a quasi-statical way until the pressure of A is PA=32P0.

Obtain the final volumes VA and VB in terms of V0.

Obtain the final temperatures TA and TB.



This is my problem. Well... first of all, what does it mean a "quasi-statical heat introduction?". I know the ideal gas internal energy is given by

U=3/2*nRT=3/2*PV and that U=Q-W but without knowing the amount of heat, how can I determine the internal energy and the work done, in order to calculate the new volumes?


Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gabriel Maia said:
A cylinder has rigid, adiabatic and impermeable external walls. It is provided with a mobile internal ideal partition wall, dividing it in two volumes (A and B). Each volume is filled with an ideal monoatomic gas. Initially, the volume, pressure and temperature of A and B are identical (P0,V0,T0). A certain amount of heat is then introduced into A in a quasi-statical way until the pressure of A is PA=32P0.

Obtain the final volumes VA and VB in terms of V0.

Obtain the final temperatures TA and TB.



This is my problem. Well... first of all, what does it mean a "quasi-statical heat introduction?". I know the ideal gas internal energy is given by

U=3/2*nRT=3/2*PV and that U=Q-W but without knowing the amount of heat, how can I determine the internal energy and the work done, in order to calculate the new volumes?


Thank you.

quasi-statical heat introduction means reversibly. How are the pressures in the two chambers related during this process? How does the sum of the volumes of the two chambers change during the process?

Try starting out by focusing on the chamber that is not heated. What type of process does the gas within this chamber experience:
A) Adiabatic reversible
B) Adiabatic irreversible
C) Isothermal reversible
D) Isothermal irreversible
E) Something else

Based on the answers to these questions, what is the final volume of the unheated chamber?
What is the final temperature of the unheated chamber?
What is the final volume of the heated chamber?
Using the ideal gas law, what is the final temperature of the heated chamber?
 
Well... the sum of the volumes is constant. The chamber that are not heated undergoes an adiabatic compression. Therefore, the change in its internal energy is

deltaU = P*deltaV

This pressure P... is it the 32P0 pressure of the heated chamber? Shouldn't it decrease as the wall moves?
 
Gabriel Maia said:
Well... the sum of the volumes is constant. The chamber that are not heated undergoes an adiabatic compression.
Yes. Very good.
Therefore, the change in its internal energy is

deltaU = P*deltaV
No. This is not the equation for the internal energy change in a reversible adiabatic compression. How are pressure and volume related in the reversible adiabatic compression of an ideal monotonic gas?
This pressure P... is it the 32P0 pressure of the heated chamber? Shouldn't it decrease as the wall moves?

No. The gas is being compressed, so the pressure in the unheated chamber should increase from P0 to 32P0. This should give you enough information to get the final volume of the unheated chamber in terms of V0.

Chet
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top