Thermodynamics and polytropic ideal gas (very simple theory question)

AI Thread Summary
In thermodynamics, the work done in a quasi-static polytropic process is expressed as W = ∫PdV, where P is pressure and V is volume. For a polytropic process with n=1, the relationship simplifies to PV = constant, allowing the substitution of P with P1V1/V. This substitution enables the integral to be evaluated as W = P1V1 ln(V2/V1), where P1 and V1 are constants representing the initial state of the system. The key point is that while P and V change during the process, P1 and V1 remain constant, allowing for the integral equality to hold. The discussion concludes with the realization that understanding these constants clarifies the integration process.
member 428835
hey all!

i have a question i was hoping some of you could unravel. specifically, in thermodynamics i understand in a quasi-static situation we can right work as:

W=\int PdV where W is work, P is pressure, and V is volume.

my book defines polytropic to be PV^n = constant

it then writes the following polytropic, quasi-static equality when n=1 , which is where i am lost:

W=\int PdV = \int P \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P{V_1} \int \frac{{dV}}{V} = P{V_1} ln(\frac{{V_2}}{V_1})

specifically, if PV_1 is constant, then if we pull it out of the integral how is it we integrate over \frac{1}{V} ? why doesn't the equality implode here: \int P \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P{V_1} \int \frac{{dV}}{V} if V_1 is a constant why isn't V? any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think either you copied something wrong our your book is leaving out a small detail here. Namely, for the polytropic process with n=1, you have the relation simplified to
pV = c.
So, if you have some base state that represents the starting conditions of your system, you can say
p_1 V_1 = c.
There, p_1 and V_1 are both constants because they simply represent the pressure and volume of your system at its initial state. You can rearrange this for substitution into the work equation,
p = \dfrac{c}{V} = \dfrac{p_1 V_1}{V}
They are initial conditions. Going back to your work equation,
W = \int\limits_1^2 p\;dV = \int\limits_1^2 \dfrac{p_1 V_1}{V}\;dV = p_1 V_1 \int\limits_1^2 \dfrac{1}{V}\;dV = p_1 V_1 \left.\ln(V)\right|_1^2 = p_1 V_1 \left[\ln(V_2) - \ln(V_1)\right] = p_1 V_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{V_2}{V_1}\right)
which recovers the answer in your question with the exception that there is a subscript 1 in front of the pressure term. The key is that you know that pV is equal to a constant, and you "know" the initial state of the system, so you can replace that constant with the values of p and V at that initial state, and both of those are constants and can be removed from the integral. In short, p_1 and [/itex]V_1[/itex] are constants while p and V are not because the former refer to specific values of the later at a specific time, and those don't change.
 
joshmccraney said:
hey all!

i have a question i was hoping some of you could unravel. specifically, in thermodynamics i understand in a quasi-static situation we can right work as:

W=\int PdV where W is work, P is pressure, and V is volume.

my book defines polytropic to be PV^n = constant

it then writes the following polytropic, quasi-static equality when n=1 , which is where i am lost:

W=\int PdV = \int P \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P{V_1} \int \frac{{dV}}{V} = P{V_1} ln(\frac{{V_2}}{V_1})
The P is missing a subscript.

If PV = constant then PV must equal P1V1, so P = P1V1/V.

So:

W=\int PdV = \int P_1 \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P_1V_1 \int \frac{{dV}}{V} = P_1V_1 ln(\frac{{V_2}}{V_1})

specifically, if PV_1 is constant,

PV = constant. So PV1 cannot be constant (ie. P cannot be constant) as V changes.

AM
 
boneh3ad said:
In short, p_1 and V_1 are constants while p and V are not because the former refer to specific values of the later at a specific time, and those don't change.

if this is true, how can we make the questionable integral equality? it seems if V_1 \neq V then we cannot have the equality that was pointed out. can you explain?
 
never mind, it just "clicked". thanks guys! yay for PF saving the day again!
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Back
Top