Thermodynamics: Comment on mistake

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving the change in Gibbs free energy for a mole of water when its temperature is raised from 25°C to 30°C at atmospheric pressure. Participants are examining the assumptions and calculations related to the Gibbs free energy equation and the implications of temperature and pressure changes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy, questioning the original poster's assumptions about the heat and work terms in the Gibbs free energy equation. There is also exploration of the implications of non-constant temperature on the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the original poster's reasoning and pointing out potential mistakes. Some participants suggest alternative approaches, such as using thermodynamic tables, while others seek clarification on specific terms and relationships in thermodynamics.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the use of thermodynamic tables and the relationship of entropy at constant pressure, indicating that the original poster may be grappling with the available data and how to apply it effectively.

WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Suppose you have a mole of water at 25##^{\circ}## at atmospheric pressure. You then raise its temperature to 30##^{\circ}##. Determine the change in Gibbs free energy. To compensate for the change, once can raise the pressure on water, how much pressure you need to increase?

I know the right way to do this problem, but I would like to know what I did wrong initially with the following steps:

I knew ##\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S = \Delta Q - \Delta W_{other}##, so i thought: To raise temperature I'd probably need to provide heat, and since no mention of any non-mechanical work was made in the problem, let's take ##\Delta W_{other} = 0##

Therefore ##\Delta G = \Delta Q = C_p \Delta T##, where ##C_p## was a given.

I would then use the thermodynamic identity to work out the pressure change.

What were the wrong assumptions made?

Assistance is greatly appreciated

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

In my book ##\Delta H = c_p \Delta T##, so you missed the ##T\Delta S## altogether ? Anyway, if T is not a constant, what do you do with a term like ##T\Delta S## ?
 
BvU said:
Hi,

In my book ##\Delta H = c_p \Delta T##, so you missed the ##T\Delta S## altogether ?

Good heavens, I just spotted my mistake. It should have been ##\Delta G = \Delta W_{other}## at the end when ##Q## and ##T\Delta S## cancel. Thanks for pointing it out.

I guess that even this result wouldn't have been the most useful.

I would have made use of the fact that ##\Delta G / \Delta T = -S## to solve the problem by using the ##G## thermo-identity.

BvU said:
Hi,
Anyway, if T is not a constant, what do you do with a term like ##T\Delta S## ?

Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? Apologies.
 
WWCY said:
Could you elaborate
My comment was exclusively triggered by your ##
\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S = \Delta Q - \Delta W_{other}##.

However, the natural variables are ##T,p## and ##{N_i}## so that ##dG = -SdT + V dP +\sum\mu_idN_i## or ##\Delta G = -S\Delta T## as you found for your isobaric scenario.
 
Is it possible you are supposed to solve this problem using thermodynamic tables? Otherwise, what is your relationship for ##\Delta S## at constant pressure?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Chestermiller said:
Is it possible you are supposed to solve this problem using thermodynamic tables? Otherwise, what is your relationship for ##\Delta S## at constant pressure?

If what is meant by thermodynamic tables is given values for quantities like entropy then yes, I was. I guess most of my confusion came from not knowing where to start, given the table of values.
 
WWCY said:
If what is meant by thermodynamic tables is given values for quantities like entropy then yes, I was. I guess most of my confusion came from not knowing where to start, given the table of values.
Does your (compressed water) table give values for P, T, v, u, h, and s?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K