Thermodynamics- conservation of heat and energy

AI Thread Summary
A 3.60 kg copper block at 92 °C is dropped into a 1.50 kg ice-water mixture, reaching thermal equilibrium at 5 °C. The conservation of heat principle states that the heat lost by the copper equals the heat gained by the ice and water. The total heat lost by the copper is calculated to be 121,208 J, which must be balanced by the heat absorbed by the ice and water. The discussion emphasizes the need to define variables for the masses of ice and water, simplifying calculations by using the total mass of the mixture. The conversation concludes with a focus on ensuring that after melting, all ice converts to water for further calculations.
PhysicsInNJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 3.60 kg block of copper at a temperature of 92 °C is dropped into a bucket containing a mixture of ice and water whose total mass is 1.50 kg. When thermal equilibrium is reached the temperature of the water is 5 °C. How much ice was in the bucket before the copper block was placed in it?
(ci = 2000 J/(kg.°C), cw = 4186 J/(kg.°C), Lf=3.35 × 105 J/kg, Lv=2.26 × 106 J/kg, ccopper = 387 J/(kg.°C). Neglect the heat capacity of the bucket.)

Homework Equations


Q=mcΔT
Q=mL

The Attempt at a Solution


Because of conservation of heat, the energy the copper block loses must be gained by the ice/water system.

So; QLOST= QGAINED

Expanded it should become something like;

(cmΔT)COPPER =
(heat to raise temperature of ice) + (heat to raise temperature of water) + (latent heat to melt ice) + (latent heat to vaporize water)

However I think there are too many unknowns at this point.

Any idea on what a possible next step could be / look like, or if I'm even doing this remotely correctly?
All help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based upon the temperatures given, why are you including the latent heat of vaporization of water?
 
PhysicsInNJ said:

Homework Statement


A 3.60 kg block of copper at a temperature of 92 °C is dropped into a bucket containing a mixture of ice and water whose total mass is 1.50 kg. When thermal equilibrium is reached the temperature of the water is 5 °C. How much ice was in the bucket before the copper block was placed in it?
(ci = 2000 J/(kg.°C), cw = 4186 J/(kg.°C), Lf=3.35 × 105 J/kg, Lv=2.26 × 106 J/kg, ccopper = 387 J/(kg.°C). Neglect the heat capacity of the bucket.)

Homework Equations


Q=mcΔT
Q=mL

The Attempt at a Solution


Because of conservation of heat, the energy the copper block loses must be gained by the ice/water system.

So; QLOST= QGAINED

Expanded it should become something like;

(cmΔT)COPPER =
(heat to raise temperature of ice) + (heat to raise temperature of water) + (latent heat to melt ice) + (latent heat to vaporize water)

However I think there are too many unknowns at this point.

Any idea on what a possible next step could be / look like, or if I'm even doing this remotely correctly?
All help appreciated!
Since thermal equilibrium is reached at 5° C, you don't have to worry about vaporizing any water.

This is essentially a book keeping problem, where you are trying to balance the heat given up by the copper block to the heat gained by the water/ice mixture.

I would start by figuring out how much heat the copper block gives up. Then I would see how much ice would be needed to absorb this heat given up by the copper.
 
I figured out how much energy the copper gives up, its 121208 J.
So when I set them equal to each other I get:

121208 = (1.5-mwater)(2000)(ΔT) + (1.5 -mice)(4186)(ΔT) + (1.5- mwater)(3.35x105)
energy lost by copper = energy gained by ice +energy gained by water + latent heat to melt ice

I have 3 unknown variables to solve for
 
Remember you are given the total mass of the ice and water combined.with the mass of ice as the unknown.
 
Right, so for the last part (latent heat) it would just be (1.5)(3.35x105) But for the first two i don't see how I can separate the mass since i don't know the original of either. I know the combined, but not individual.
 
If you know the total heat input and the total heat absorption of the combined ice and water mass then what is the remaining unknown and what part of that unknown do you know about the ice.
 
PhysicsInNJ said:
Right, so for the last part (latent heat) it would just be (1.5)(3.35x105)

No, this is not correct. Some, but not all of the water/ice mixture, is water already, so the latent heat is required only to melt the ice.

But for the first two i don't see how I can separate the mass since i don't know the original of either. I know the combined, but not individual.

Look, if the mass of water + ice = 1.5 kg, it stands to reason that by letting x be the amount of ice in the mixture, (1.5 - x) will be the amount of water you start with.
 
Ok, that makes sense.
re-written:
121208= (1.5-mwater)(2000)(ΔT) + (mwater)(4186)(ΔT) + (1.5 - mwater)(3.35x105)
I could simplify some more but still ΔT and one of the masses is unknown.
I'm having a real mental block with this one. Normally with two variables I would do some kind of substitution but I can't think of anything to substitute.
 
  • #10
Once the of the total heat capacity of the combined ice and water is determined and subtracted from the total heat capacity of the copper block, what is left? With that information, what do you know about the two heat absorption rates of the ice mass and the temperatures at which those rates occur.
 
  • #11
PhysicsInNJ said:
.
I'm having a real mental block with this one. Normally with two variables I would do some kind of substitution but I can't think of anything to substitute.

I think the thing you're missing is the initial temperature of the ice-water mixture. Also, once the ice melts, it turns into water.
 
  • #12
PhysicsInNJ said:
Ok, that makes sense.
re-written:
121208= (1.5-mwater)(2000)(ΔT) + (mwater)(4186)(ΔT) + (1.5 - mwater)(3.35x105)
You're making some extra work for yourself here.
If you assume x = mass of the ice, then you can replace (1.5 - mwater) with x and save some unnecessary calculation. mwater = (1.5 - x), of course.
I could simplify some more but still ΔT and one of the masses is unknown.
Perhaps this article can answer the question about the initial temperature of the water/ice mixture:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frigorific_mixture

I'm having a real mental block with this one. Normally with two variables I would do some kind of substitution but I can't think of anything to substitute.

Just take things slow and steady. Work through the arithmetic and see if you can't wind up with x = some expression.
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicsInNJ
  • #13
Thank you so much! using x made a lot more sense, and simplified it down. Once again, I appreciate the help
 
  • #14
Don't forget that after the ice melts, it's all water!
 
Back
Top