Thickness of a partially reflective copper mirror

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the fabrication of a copper mirror intended to achieve 41% reflectance at a wavelength of 1521nm. The initial calculations using the formula R = 1 - e-αt resulted in a thickness of 6.25nm, but the actual mirror exhibited minimal reflection. Participants noted that the formula primarily addresses absorption and transmission, not reflection, which may also depend on the substrate used. The conversation highlights the importance of considering the interface effects and the transparency of the medium in determining reflectivity. This indicates that the observed low reflectivity could be attributed to the high transparency of the copper layer and its interaction with the substrate.
Ngineer
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

We are trying to fabricate a copper layer that is 41% reflective to a beam of 1521nm wavelength.

The formula I have used to calculate the thickness is:

R = 1 - e-αt

Where
R: desired reflectance of mirror
t: thickness of mirror that would produce said reflectance
α: material- and wavelength-specific absorption coefficient. (for copper at 1521nm: α = 8.4327e+5 cm-1, from http://refractiveindex.info/?shelf=main&book=Cu&page=Rakic)

For these values, I get t=6.25nm. When they fabricated it at the lab, there was almost no reflection at all.

Is the formula wrong? I based it on the transmission of a mirror being approximately T=e-αt and R being 1-T for a mirror. Is there a siginificant amount of energy absorbed by the copper itself?

Your help is highly appreciated.
 
Science news on Phys.org
That exponential formula represents how much of the radiation entering the sample is absorbed. The rest goes through.
Reflection is another story. It may depend on the substrate too.
Maybe this will be useful
http://www.filmetrics.com/reflectance-calculator
 
Hi Nasu,

Reflection is what we are interested in. Unfortunately, the link you provided does not offer an insight into the theory involved. Where do I start reading?

I have assumed it would be rather simple as only normal incidence is involved.
 
Also, if a portion of the energy is transmitted, and the rest is absorbed (as described by this formula), wouldn't that mean that no reflection at all takes place?

Moreover, the fabricated mirror was almost completely transmissive, and not 59% transmissive as it should according to the formula (regardless of whether remaining energy is reflected or absorbed).
 
At the interface part of the beam is reflected, part enters the second medium. Your formula describes how this second part behaves as it propagates through the medium.

And your observed behaviour makes sense. If the medium is very transparent, the reflectivity is very low.

You can use that online calculator to calculate the reflection coefficient for layers of copper of various thicknesses on a substrate. I suppose your copper layer is on some substrate, isn't it?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top